ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2014
Radioembolization of hepatic tumors.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.
- A comprehensive review on the current applications and future perspectives of radioembolization in endovascular neurosurgery.Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2026Review
- Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations to Inform Cancer Therapeutics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- Advanced targeted microsphere embolization for arteriovenous malformations: state-of-the-art and future directions.Neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Functional hydrogels for hepatocellular carcinoma: therapy, imaging, and in vitro model.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Review
- Physics-Guided Deep Scatter Estimation by Weak Supervision for Quantitative SPECT.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2023Article
- Current and upcoming radionuclide therapies in the direction of precision oncology: A narrative review.European journal of radiology open · 2023Article
- Phase I prospective trial of TAS-102 (trifluridine and tipiracil) and radioembolization withBMC cancer · 2022Article
- Optimization of the Clinical Effectiveness of Radioembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Dosimetry and Patient-Selection Criteria.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2022Review
- Can pretreatment hepatic artery perfusion scintigraphy in patients with liver malignancies predict the treatment response of the selective internal radiation therapy with 90Y resin microspheres?Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2022Article
- Microspheres Used in Liver Radioembolization: From Conception to Clinical Effects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Tumor response prediction inEJNMMI physics · 2020Article
- Algorithms and Analyses for Joint Spectral Image Reconstruction in Y-90 Bremsstrahlung SPECT.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- Neutron-activated biodegradable samarium-153 acetylacetonate-poly-L-lactic acid microspheres for intraarterial radioembolization of hepatic tumors.World journal of experimental medicine · 2020Article
- Liver Resection After Selective Internal Radiation Therapy with Yttrium-90: Safety and Outcomes.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2020Article
- Management of oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients: Current controversies and future directions.World journal of clinical oncology · 2019Review
- Assessing Spatial Concordance Between Theranostic Pairs Using Phantom and Patient-Specific Acceptance Criteria: Application toInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2019Article
- Impact ofEJNMMI physics · 2018Article
- Fibrolamellar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Treatment with Yttrium-90 and Subsequent Surgical Resection.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2018Article
- Distribution of PEG-coated hollow polyelectrolyte microcapsules after introduction into the circulatory system and muscles of zebrafish.Biology open · 2018Article
- Recommendations for radioembolisation after liver surgery using yttrium-90 resin microspheres based on a survey of an international expert panel.European radiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unresectable primary and metastatic liver tumors are a leading cause of cancer mortality and morbidity. This remains a challenging and key task for every oncologist despite significant advances that have been made with selective targeted systemic agents and in technology advances with radiotherapy delivery. Radioembolization (RE) is a technique of permanently implanting microspheres containing Yttrium-90 ((90)Y), a beta-emitting isotope with a treatment range of 2 mm, into hepatic tumors. This form of brachytherapy utilizes the unique dual vascular anatomy of the liver to preferentially deliver radioactive particles via the hepatic artery to tumor, sparing normal liver parenchyma. The main treatment inclusion criteria are patients with solid tumors, compensated liver functions, life expectancy of at least three months, and ECOG performance status 0-2. Benefit of RE has been proven in patients that have low-to-moderate extrahepatic disease burden, prior liver radiotherapy, heavy prior chemotherapy and biologic agent exposure, and history of hepatic surgery or ablation. Most of the clinical evidence is reported in metastatic colorectal, and neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and primary hepatocellular cancer. A growing body of data supports the use of RE in hepatic metastatic breast cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarinoma, and many other metastatic tumor types. Side effects are typically mild constitutional and GI issues limited to the first 7-14 days post treatment, with only 6% grade 3 toxicity reported in large series. Potentially serious or fatal radiation induced liver disease is extremely rare, reported in only 1% or fewer in major series of both metastatic and primary tumors treated with RE. Currently, high priority prospective clinical trials are testing RE combined with chemotherapy in first line therapy for colorectal hepatic metastases, and combined with sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs). Fortunately, this beneficial and now widely available therapy is being increasingly incorporated into the standard therapy algorithms of multidisciplinary GI cancer teams worldwide. This form of radiotherapy differs significantly from daily external beam radiotherapy in many ways, particularly in dose rate, dosimetric coverage and duration of radiation delivery, side effects, and patient selection factors. A wealth of experience using RE in solid tumors exists and ongoing major prospective clinical trials will soon clarify the role of RE in the management of metastatic colorectal liver metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.