Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24982765›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2014

Adjuvant chemoradiation for pancreatic cancer: what does the evidence tell us?

Michael D Chuong, Drexell H Boggs, Kruti N Patel, William F Regine

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Pancreatic cancer: a haystack of needles.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment of pancreatic cancer].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael D ChuongDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Drexell H BoggsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
Kruti N PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
William F RegineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Systems, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.
University of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for pancreas cancer remains unclear. A handful of randomized trials conducted decades of ago ignited a debate that continues today about whether CRT improves survival after surgery. The many flaws in these trials are well described in the literature, which include the use of antiquated radiation delivery techniques and suboptimal doses. Recent prospective randomized data is lacking, and we eagerly await the results the ongoing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0848 trial that is evaluating the utility of high quality adjuvant CRT in resected pancreas cancer patients. Until the results of RTOG 0848 are available we should look to other studies from the modern era to guide adjuvant treatment recommendations. Here we review the current state of the art for adjuvant pancreas CRT with respect to patient selection, radiation techniques, radiation dose, and integration with novel systemic agents.

Indexed as

adjuvant chemoradiation (CRT)Pancreas cancerradiation therapy (RT)

Identifiers

PMID24982765
PMCPMC4074954
OpenAlexW2176692334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.