Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24982637›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2014

Native extracellular matrix: a new scaffolding platform for repair of damaged muscle.

Laura Teodori, Alessandra Costa, Rosa Marzio, Barbara Perniconi, Dario Coletti, Sergio Adamo, Bhuvanesh Gupta, Attila Tarnok

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Scaffolds in Tendon Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Laura TeodoriUTAPRAD-DIM, ENEA Frascati Rome, Italy ; Fondazione San Raffaele Ceglie Messapica, Italy.
Alessandra CostaFondazione San Raffaele Ceglie Messapica, Italy ; Department of Surgery, McGowan Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Rosa MarzioFondazione San Raffaele Ceglie Messapica, Italy.
Barbara PerniconiUMR 8256 CNRS Biology of Adaptation and Aging, University Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06 Paris, France.
Dario ColettiUMR 8256 CNRS Biology of Adaptation and Aging, University Pierre et Marie Curie Paris 06 Paris, France ; Section of Histology and Medical Embryology, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
Sergio AdamoSection of Histology and Medical Embryology, Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic and Orthopaedic Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome Rome, Italy.
Bhuvanesh GuptaDepartment of Textile Technology, Indian Institute of Technology New Delhi, India.
Attila TarnokDepartment of Pediatric Cardiology, Heart Centre Leipzig, and Translational Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITAdaptation Biologique et VieillissementIndian Institute of Technology Delhi · INLeipzig University · DEMcGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine · USNational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective clinical treatments for volumetric muscle loss resulting from traumatic injury or resection of a large amount of muscle mass are not available to date. Tissue engineering may represent an alternative treatment approach. Decellularization of tissues and whole organs is a recently introduced platform technology for creating scaffolding materials for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. The muscle stem cell niche is composed of a three-dimensional architecture of fibrous proteins, proteoglycans, and glycosaminoglycans, synthesized by the resident cells that form an intricate extracellular matrix (ECM) network in equilibrium with the surrounding cells and growth factors. A consistent body of evidence indicates that ECM proteins regulate stem cell differentiation and renewal and are highly relevant to tissue engineering applications. The ECM also provides a supportive medium for blood or lymphatic vessels and for nerves. Thus, the ECM is the nature's ideal biological scaffold material. ECM-based bioscaffolds can be recellularized to create potentially functional constructs as a regenerative medicine strategy for organ replacement or tissue repopulation. This article reviews current strategies for the repair of damaged muscle using bioscaffolds obtained from animal ECM by decellularization of small intestinal submucosa (SIS), urinary bladder mucosa (UB), and skeletal muscle, and proposes some innovative approaches for the application of such strategies in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

biomaterialsdecellularizationextracellular matrixregenerative medicinescaffoldskeletal muscletissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID24982637
PMCPMC4058757
OpenAlexW1991245603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.