Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24982625›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2014

From speech to thought: the neuronal basis of cognitive units in non-experimental, real-life communication investigated using ECoG.

Johanna Derix, Olga Iljina, Johanna Weiske, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Ad Aertsen, Tonio Ball

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Decoding of Spontaneous Overt and Intended Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna DerixDepartment of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Department of Neurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Olga IljinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; GRK 1624, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Department of German Linguistics, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Hermann Paul School of Linguistics, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Johanna WeiskeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Department of Neurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Andreas Schulze-BonhageDepartment of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Ad AertsenDepartment of Neurobiology and Biophysics, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.
Tonio BallDepartment of Neurosurgery, Epilepsy Center, University Medical Center Freiburg Freiburg, Germany ; Bernstein Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exchange of thoughts by means of expressive speech is fundamental to human communication. However, the neuronal basis of real-life communication in general, and of verbal exchange of ideas in particular, has rarely been studied until now. Here, our aim was to establish an approach for exploring the neuronal processes related to cognitive "idea" units (IUs) in conditions of non-experimental speech production. We investigated whether such units corresponding to single, coherent chunks of speech with syntactically-defined borders, are useful to unravel the neuronal mechanisms underlying real-world human cognition. To this aim, we employed simultaneous electrocorticography (ECoG) and video recordings obtained in pre-neurosurgical diagnostics of epilepsy patients. We transcribed non-experimental, daily hospital conversations, identified IUs in transcriptions of the patients' speech, classified the obtained IUs according to a previously-proposed taxonomy focusing on memory content, and investigated the underlying neuronal activity. In each of our three subjects, we were able to collect a large number of IUs which could be assigned to different functional IU subclasses with a high inter-rater agreement. Robust IU-onset-related changes in spectral magnitude could be observed in high gamma frequencies (70-150 Hz) on the inferior lateral convexity and in the superior temporal cortex regardless of the IU content. A comparison of the topography of these responses with mouth motor and speech areas identified by electrocortical stimulation showed that IUs might be of use for extraoperative mapping of eloquent cortex (average sensitivity: 44.4%, average specificity: 91.1%). High gamma responses specific to memory-related IU subclasses were observed in the inferior parietal and prefrontal regions. IU-based analysis of ECoG recordings during non-experimental communication thus elicits topographically- and functionally-specific effects. We conclude that segmentation of spontaneous real-world speech in linguistically-motivated units is a promising strategy for elucidating the neuronal basis of mental processing during non-experimental communication.

Indexed as

autobiographical memoryelectrocorticographyhigh gamma mappingidea unitnatural behaviorparietal cortexprefrontal cortexspeech production

Identifiers

PMID24982625
PMCPMC4056309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.