Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24982496›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014

Access to general practice and visits to accident and emergency departments in England: cross-sectional analysis of a national patient survey.

Thomas E Cowling, Matthew J Harris, Hilary C Watt, Daniel C Gibbons, Azeem Majeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of integrating pharmacists into primary care teams on health systems indicators: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perspectives of GPs working in or alongside emergency departments in England: qualitative findings from the GPs and Emergency Departments Study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Are more GPs associated with a reduction in emergency hospital admissions? A quantitative study on GP referral in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Cancer diagnoses after emergency GP referral or A&E attendance in England: determinants and time trends in Routes to Diagnosis data, 2006-2015.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas E CowlingDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Matthew J HarrisDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Hilary C WattDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Daniel C GibbonsDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2011-04-054Department of Health DRF-2013-06-142
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe annual number of unplanned attendances at accident and emergency (A&E) departments in England increased by 11% (2.2 million attendances) between 2008-2009 and 2012-2013. A national review of urgent and emergency care has emphasised the role of access to primary care services in preventing A&E attendances.

aimTo estimate the number of A&E attendances in England in 2012-2013 that were preceded by the attending patient being unable to obtain an appointment or a convenient appointment at their general practice. DESIGN AND

settingCross-sectional analysis of a national survey of adults registered with a GP in England.

methodThe number of general practice consultations in England in 2012-2013 was estimated by extrapolating the linear trend of published data for 2000-2001 to 2008-2009. This parameter was multiplied by the ratio of attempts to obtain a general practice appointment that resulted in an A&E attendance to attempts that resulted in a general practice consultation estimated using the GP Patient Survey 2012-2013. A sensitivity analysis varied the number of consultations by ±12% and the ratio by ±25%.

resultsAn estimated 5.77 million (99.9% confidence interval = 5.49 to 6.05 million) A&E attendances were preceded by the attending patient being unable to obtain a general practice appointment or a convenient appointment, comprising 26.5% of unplanned A&E attendances in England in 2012-2013. The sensitivity analysis produced values between 17.5% and 37.2% of unplanned A&E attendances.

conclusionA large number of A&E attendances are likely to be preceded by unsuccessful attempts to obtain convenient general practice appointments in England each year.

Indexed as

AdultAge DistributionAmbulatory CareAppointments and SchedulesCross-Sectional StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Care SurveysHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CareSex Distributionaccess to health careemergency departmentsgeneral practicepatient appointmentsprimary health careurgent care

Identifiers

PMID24982496
PMCPMC4073729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.