ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2014
eHealth: where next?
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- eHealth Applications Improve Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- A smartphone "app"-delivered randomized factorial trial targeting physical activity in adults.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2017Trial
- Article
- Associations between adoption of eHealth management module and optimal control of HbA1c in diabetes patients.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- The compatibility of reductionistic and complexity approaches in a sociomedical innovation perspective.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Prescribing of Electronic Activity Monitors in Cardiometabolic Diseases: Qualitative Interview-Based Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Are patient relationships the driver for information governance?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.