Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24981969›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2014

A structural perspective of compensatory evolution.

Dmitry N Ivankov, Alexei V Finkelstein, Fyodor A Kondrashov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Epistasis-mediated compensatory evolution in a fitness landscape with adaptational tradeoffs.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing epistasis in the design of protein function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Biomolecules · 2023
    Article
  7. Distinguishing features of fold-switching proteins.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Using metagenomic data to boost protein structure prediction and discovery.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Compensatory mutations and epistasis for protein function.Current opinion in structural biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dmitry N IvankovBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), 88 Dr. Aiguader, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Laboratory of Protein Physics, Institute of Protein Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Institutskaya str., Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia.
Alexei V FinkelsteinLaboratory of Protein Physics, Institute of Protein Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Institutskaya str., Pushchino, Moscow Region, 142290, Russia.
Fyodor A KondrashovBioinformatics and Genomics Programme, Centre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), 88 Dr. Aiguader, 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), 08003 Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), 23 Pg. Lluís Companys, 08010 Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address: Fyodor.Kondrashov@crg.eu.

Funding

European Research Council 335980Howard Hughes Medical Institute 55007424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of molecular evolution is important because it reveals how protein functions emerge and evolve. Recently, several types of studies indicated that substitutions in molecular evolution occur in a compensatory manner, whereby the occurrence of a substitution depends on the amino acid residues at other sites. However, a molecular or structural basis behind the compensation often remains obscure. Here, we review studies on the interface of structural biology and molecular evolution that revealed novel aspects of compensatory evolution. In many cases structural studies benefit from evolutionary data while structural data often add a functional dimension to the study of molecular evolution.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsBase SequenceHumansProtein EngineeringProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID24981969
PMCPMC4141909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.