Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24981874›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy.

Kevin Van Bortle, Michael H Nichols, Li Li, Chin-Tong Ong, Naomi Takenaka, Zhaohui S Qin, Victor G Corces

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transcription and Three-Dimensional Genome Organization: Cause, Consequence, or Coordination?BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  14. Machine and Deep Learning Methods for Predicting 3D Genome Organization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The RNA Revolution in the Central Molecular Biology Dogma Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kevin Van Bortle
Michael H Nichols
Li Li
Chin-Tong Ong
Naomi Takenaka
Zhaohui S Qin
Victor G Corces

Funding

MOLECULAR BASIS OF SUPPRESSION IN DROSOPHILAR01GM035463 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CORCES, VICTOR G. · 1986 to 2020
$10.7M
DROSOPHILA GENOMICS RESOURCE CENTERP40OD010949 · OD · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Zelhof · 2012 to 2026
$9.4M
PREDOCTORAL TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM008490 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOSS, JEREMY M. · 1993 to 2022
$8.0M
Training Program in Biochemistry, Cell and Molecular BiologyT32GM008367 · NIGMS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI BOISE, LAWRENCE H., CORBETT, ANITA H. · 1990 to 2019
$5.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM035463NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM035463NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008367NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008490NIH HHS OD010949-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChromosome conformation capture studies suggest that eukaryotic genomes are organized into structures called topologically associating domains. The borders of these domains are highly enriched for architectural proteins with characterized roles in insulator function. However, a majority of architectural protein binding sites localize within topological domains, suggesting sites associated with domain borders represent a functionally different subclass of these regulatory elements. How topologically associating domains are established and what differentiates border-associated from non-border architectural protein binding sites remain unanswered questions.

resultsBy mapping the genome-wide target sites for several Drosophila architectural proteins, including previously uncharacterized profiles for TFIIIC and SMC-containing condensin complexes, we uncover an extensive pattern of colocalization in which architectural proteins establish dense clusters at the borders of topological domains. Reporter-based enhancer-blocking insulator activity as well as endogenous domain border strength scale with the occupancy level of architectural protein binding sites, suggesting co-binding by architectural proteins underlies the functional potential of these loci. Analyses in mouse and human stem cells suggest that clustering of architectural proteins is a general feature of genome organization, and conserved architectural protein binding sites may underlie the tissue-invariant nature of topologically associating domains observed in mammals.

conclusionsWe identify a spectrum of architectural protein occupancy that scales with the topological structure of chromosomes and the regulatory potential of these elements. Whereas high occupancy architectural protein binding sites associate with robust partitioning of topologically associating domains and robust insulator function, low occupancy sites appear reserved for gene-specific regulation within topological domains.

Indexed as

Genes, InsectAdenosine TriphosphatasesAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneChromosome MappingCohesinsConsensus SequenceDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsAdenosine TriphosphatasesCCCTC-Binding FactorCell Cycle ProteinsChromatinChromosomal Proteins, Non-HistoneCohesinscondensin complexesCTCF protein, humanCtcf protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesRepressor ProteinsTranscription Factors, TFIIITranscription Factor TFIIIC

Identifiers

PMID24981874
PMCPMC4226948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.