ArticleMethods (San Diego, Calif.)2014
Integrative analysis of independent transcriptome data for rare diseases.
Article in Methods (San Diego, Calif.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- RD-OMICS: An Integrative Multi-Omics Data Inventory in Rare Diseases.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the mechanism of Yi Qi Huo Xue compound prescription in treating chronic heart failure based on integrated network pharmacology and transcriptomics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Pharmacologic modeling of primary mitochondrial respiratory chain dysfunction in zebrafish.Neurochemistry international · 2018Article
- Identification of miRNA, lncRNA and mRNA-associated ceRNA networks and potential biomarker for MELAS with mitochondrial DNA A3243G mutation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput technologies used to interrogate transcriptomes have been generating a great amount of publicly available gene expression data. For rare diseases that lack of clinical samples and research funding, there is a practical benefit to jointly analyze existing data sets commonly related to a specific rare disease. In this study, we collected a number of independently generated transcriptome data sets from four species: human, fly, mouse and worm. All data sets included samples with both normal and abnormal mitochondrial function. We reprocessed each data set to standardize format, scale and gene annotation and used HomoloGene database to map genes between species. Standardized procedure was also applied to compare gene expression profiles of normal and abnormal mitochondrial function to identify differentially expressed genes. We further used meta-analysis and other integrative analyses to recognize patterns across data sets and species. Novel insights related to mitochondrial dysfunction was revealed via these analyses, such as a group of genes consistently dysregulated by impaired mitochondrial function in multiple species. This study created a template for the study of rare diseases using genomic technologies and advanced statistical methods. All data and results generated by this study are freely available and stored at http://goo.gl/nOGWC2, to support further data mining.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.