ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2014
Primary immunodeficiency diseases: a 30-year patient registry from the referral center for primary immunodeficiencies in Greece.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Functional Complement Analysis Can Predict Genetic Testing Results and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Complement Deficiencies.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Trial
- Inborn errors of immunity: Manifestation, treatment, and outcome-an ESID registry 1994-2024 report on 30,628 patients.Journal of human immunity · 2025Article
- Patient's Experience in Pediatric Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders: Computerized Classification of Questionnaires.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Article
- The Duesseldorf warning signs for primary immunodeficiency: is it time to change the rules?Journal of clinical immunology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary Immunodeficiencies (PID) represent a group of heterogeneous immune diseases with important biological significance. We reviewed the records of children diagnosed with PID in the Referral Center for PID in our country in order to describe the epidemiological, clinical and laboratory characteristics of immunodeficient patients. During a 30-year period, 147 patients (101 males, 68.7 %), with a mean age of 6.5 years at the time of diagnosis, were diagnosed with PID. The most prevalent diagnoses of PID were: "Combined Immunodeficiency" in 46 (31.3 %) patients, "Well-defined immunodeficiency syndrome" in 35 (23.1 %) patients, "Predominantly antibody deficiency" in 30 (20.4 %) patients and "Congenital defect of phagocyte function or both" in 28 (19 %) patients. There was a higher prevalence of males with "Combined immunodeficiency" (p < 0.033) and "Predominantly antibody deficiency" (p < 0.02) compared to females. The median age of children at the onset of symptoms and at the time of diagnosis was 0.5y (IQR: 0.1-2.5) and 2y (IQR: 0.6-7.2), respectively. The median diagnostic delay was 0.9y (IQR: 0.2-4.8). This period was shorter for patients with "Combined immunodeficiency" [median 0.3y (IQR: 0.1-1)], and longer for those with "Predominantly antibody deficiency" [median 3.2y (IQR: 0.2-5.9) or "Disease of immune dysregulation" [median 3.2y (IQR: 0.1-6.6)]. Comparing the rates in our population with those of the European Registry (ESID), the rates of "Combined immunodeficiencies", "Well-defined syndromes" and "Congenital birth defects and/or function of phagocytes" were significantly higher in this study (p <0,001). PID registry analysis improves knowledge in the field of Immunology and enhances awareness, early detection, diagnosis, and management of this rare but significant group of diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.