Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24980835›Full record

ArticlePublic health nursing (Boston, Mass.)

Doulas' Perspectives about Providing Support to Incarcerated Women: A Feasibility Study.

Rebecca J Shlafer, Wendy L Hellerstedt, Molly Secor-Turner, Erica Gerrity, Rae Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nursing (Boston, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Lactation Support for People Who Are Incarcerated: A Systematic Review.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pregnancy and Parenting Support for Incarcerated Women: Lessons Learned.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rebecca J ShlaferDivision of General Pediatrics & Adolescent Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Wendy L HellerstedtDivision of Epidemiology & Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Molly Secor-TurnerNursing Department, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota.
Erica GerrityIsis Rising - Everyday Miracles, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Rae BakerIsis Rising - Everyday Miracles, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)KL2TR000113 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$5.4M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000113NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR000114PHS HHS T76-MC00005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo document the logistical feasibility of a doula program for pregnant incarcerated women and to assess doulas' perceptions of their achievements. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Six doulas provided written case notes ("birth stories") about their experiences with 18 pregnant women in one Midwestern state prison. MEASURES: The birth stories were analyzed by two coders to identify major themes related to doulas' perceptions about providing support to incarcerated women. Analyses involved coder consensus about major themes and doula affirmation of findings.

resultsAll doulas reported that they met key objectives for a successful relationship with each of their clients. Key themes were their ability to empower clients, establish a trusting relationship, normalize the delivery, and support women as they were separated from their newborns.

conclusionsThe intervention was logistically feasible, suggesting that doulas can adapt their practice for incarcerated women. Doulas may need specific training to prepare themselves for institutional restrictions that may conflict with the traditional roles of doula care. It may be important for doulas to understand the level of personal and professional resources they may have to expend to support incarcerated women if they are separated from their infants soon after delivery.

Indexed as

Nurse-Patient RelationsNurse's RoleDelivery, ObstetricDoulasFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPrisonersPrisonsSocial Supportdoulasnarrativespregnancyprisonersqualitative researchwomen's health

Identifiers

PMID24980835
PMCPMC4281502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.