Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24980786›Full record

ReviewDrug discovery today2014

CANDO and the infinite drug discovery frontier.

Mark Minie, Gaurav Chopra, Geetika Sethi, Jeremy Horst, George White, Ambrish Roy, Kaushik Hatti, Ram Samudrala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug discovery today, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Antiviral Approaches against Influenza Virus.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A Deep-Learning Proteomic-Scale Approach for Drug Design.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mark MinieUniversity of Washington, Department of Bioengineering, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Gaurav ChopraUniversity of Washington, Department of Microbiology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States; University of California, San Francisco, Diabetes Center, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Geetika SethiUniversity of Washington, Department of Microbiology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Jeremy HorstUniversity of California, School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
George WhiteUniversity of Washington, Department of Microbiology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States.
Ambrish RoyGeorgia Institute of Technology, Center for the Study of Systems Biology, Atlanta, GA 30318, United States.
Kaushik HattiMolecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science Bangalore, 560012, India.
Ram SamudralaUniversity of Washington, Department of Microbiology, Seattle, WA 98109, United States. Electronic address: ram@compbio.org.

Funding

NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY: COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENINGDP1LM011509 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAMUDRALA, RAM · 2012 to 2014
$2.4M
NOVEL PARADIGMS FOR DRUG DISCOVERY: COMPUTATIONAL MULTITARGET SCREENINGDP1OD006779 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAMUDRALA, RAM · 2010 to 2011
$1.7M
NIH HHS 1DP1OD006779-01NIH HHS DP1 OD006779NLM NIH HHS DP1 LM011509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Computational Analysis of Novel Drug Opportunities (CANDO) platform (http://protinfo.org/cando) uses similarity of compound-proteome interaction signatures to infer homology of compound/drug behavior. We constructed interaction signatures for 3733 human ingestible compounds covering 48,278 protein structures mapping to 2030 indications based on basic science methodologies to predict and analyze protein structure, function, and interactions developed by us and others. Our signature comparison and ranking approach yielded benchmarking accuracies of 12-25% for 1439 indications with at least two approved compounds. We prospectively validated 49/82 'high value' predictions from nine studies covering seven indications, with comparable or better activity to existing drugs, which serve as novel repurposed therapeutics. Our approach may be generalized to compounds beyond those approved by the FDA, and can also consider mutations in protein structures to enable personalization. Our platform provides a holistic multiscale modeling framework of complex atomic, molecular, and physiological systems with broader applications in medicine and engineering.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryDrug RepositioningHumansModels, TheoreticalProtein ConformationProteinsProteomeProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID24980786
PMCPMC4167471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.