GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014
Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of palliative treatment for periampullary cancer: a comparison of surgical and endoscopic approaches.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Mechanisms of ferroptotic and non-ferroptotic organ toxicity of chemotherapy: protective and therapeutic effects of ginger, 6-gingerol and zingerone in preclinical studies.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- Study Protocol of a Randomized, Two-Arm, Phase I/II Trial Investigating the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Local Treatment with US-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound in Combination with Palliative Chemotherapy in Inoperable Pancreatic Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Complementary and alternative medicine mention and recommendations in pancreatic cancer clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review and quality assessment.Integrative medicine research · 2023Review
- Chemotherapy: how to reduce its adverse effects while maintaining the potency?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Article
- Impact of resection margin status on survival in advanced N stage pancreatic cancer - a multi-institutional analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2021Article
- Improving quality of life in pancreatic cancer patients following high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in two European centers.European radiology · 2021Article
- Review
- Local radicality and survival outcome of pancreatic cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Review
- [High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for tumor pain relief in inoperable pancreatic cancer : Evaluation with the pain sensation scale (SES)].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017Article
- Health services research of integrative oncology in palliative care of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.BMC cancer · 2016Observational
- Circulating DNA and Micro-RNA in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.Pancreatic disorders & therapy · 2015Article
- Ultrasound-based therapies not mentioned.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Article
- In reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on byIn reply.2015
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuctal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in men and women in Germany: about 15 000 persons die of this disease each year.
methodThe S3 guideline on exocrine pancreatic carcinoma was updated with the aid of systematic literature reviews on the surgical, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant treatment of ductal pancreatic carcinoma, and on treatment in the metastatic stage. These reviews covered the periods 2002 to February 2012 (for radiotherapy) and 2006 to August 2011 (for all other topics).
resultsThe criteria for borderline resectable pancreatic tumors are the same as those of the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Preoperative biliary drainage with a stent is recommended only if cholangitis is present or if a planned operation cannot be performed soon after the diagnosis is made. When a pancreatic carcinoma is resected, at least 10 regional lymph nodes should be excised, and the ratio of affected to excised nodes should be documented in the pathology report. Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil are recommended for adjuvant therapy. Neither of these drugs is preferred over the other; if the one initially given is poorly tolerated, the other one should be given instead. When gemcitabine and erlotinib are given for palliative treatment, erlotinib should be given for no longer than 8 weeks if no skin rash develops. In selected patients, the folfirinox protocol yields markedly better results than gemcitabin. Moreover, the new combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine can be used as first-line treatment. In the event of disease progression under first-line treatment, second-line treatment should be initiated.
conclusionIn recent years, new chemotherapeutic protocols have brought about marked improvement in palliative care. Further trials are needed to determine whether the perioperative or adjuvant use of these protocols might also improve the outcome of surgical treatment with curative intent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.