Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24980565›Full record

GuidelineDeutsches Arzteblatt international2014

Ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Thomas Seufferlein, Marc Porzner, Volker Heinemann, Andrea Tannapfel, Martin Stuschke, Waldemar Uhl

Open access · greenAbstract readPractice GuidelineReview
In one paragraph

Guideline in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Chemotherapy: how to reduce its adverse effects while maintaining the potency?Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Local radicality and survival outcome of pancreatic cancer surgery.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Ultrasound-based therapies not mentioned.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Article
  16. In reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas SeufferleinUlm University Hospital Medical Center, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical Clinic III, Department of Hematology & Oncology, Großhadern Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilian-¬Universität, Munich, Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Radiation and Tumor Clinic, University Hospital of Duisburg-Essen, Surgical Clinic at the St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum.
Marc Porzner
Volker Heinemann
Andrea Tannapfel
Martin Stuschke
Waldemar Uhl
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity Hospital Ulm · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuctal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas is the fourth most common cause of death from cancer in men and women in Germany: about 15 000 persons die of this disease each year.

methodThe S3 guideline on exocrine pancreatic carcinoma was updated with the aid of systematic literature reviews on the surgical, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant treatment of ductal pancreatic carcinoma, and on treatment in the metastatic stage. These reviews covered the periods 2002 to February 2012 (for radiotherapy) and 2006 to August 2011 (for all other topics).

resultsThe criteria for borderline resectable pancreatic tumors are the same as those of the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Preoperative biliary drainage with a stent is recommended only if cholangitis is present or if a planned operation cannot be performed soon after the diagnosis is made. When a pancreatic carcinoma is resected, at least 10 regional lymph nodes should be excised, and the ratio of affected to excised nodes should be documented in the pathology report. Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil are recommended for adjuvant therapy. Neither of these drugs is preferred over the other; if the one initially given is poorly tolerated, the other one should be given instead. When gemcitabine and erlotinib are given for palliative treatment, erlotinib should be given for no longer than 8 weeks if no skin rash develops. In selected patients, the folfirinox protocol yields markedly better results than gemcitabin. Moreover, the new combination of nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine can be used as first-line treatment. In the event of disease progression under first-line treatment, second-line treatment should be initiated.

conclusionIn recent years, new chemotherapeutic protocols have brought about marked improvement in palliative care. Further trials are needed to determine whether the perioperative or adjuvant use of these protocols might also improve the outcome of surgical treatment with curative intent.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalChemoradiotherapyGermanyHumansLaparoscopyMedical OncologyPalliative CarePancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID24980565
PMCPMC4078228
OpenAlexW2144487405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.