Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24980516›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on medical education2014

Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review.

Margret Alers, Lotte van Leerdam, Patrick Dielissen, Antoine Lagro-Janssen

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Should we consider gender aspects in pharmacology teaching? No-we must!Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stroke prevention and therapy awareness in a large sample of high school students: results of an educational campaign in the Northern-Western Italy.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Gender in Medical Education in Turkey: The Intern Perspective.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Margret AlersUnit Gender and Women's Health, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, ELG-117, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Margret.Alers@radboudumc.nl.
Lotte van LeerdamUnit Gender and Women's Health, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, ELG-117, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Patrick DielissenUnit Gender and Women's Health, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, ELG-117, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Antoine Lagro-JanssenUnit Gender and Women's Health, Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, ELG-117, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The careers of male and female physicians indicate gender differences, whereas in medical education a feminization is occurring. Our review aims to specify gender-related speciality preferences during medical education. A literature search on gender differences in medical students' speciality preferences was conducted in PubMed, Eric, Embase and Social Abstracts, and reference lists from January 2000 to June 2013. Study quality was assessed by critical appraisal. Our search yielded 741 hits and included 14, mostly cross-sectional, studies originating from various countries. No cohort studies were found. Throughout medical education, surgery is predominantly preferred by men and gynaecology, paediatrics and general practice by women. Internal medicine was pursued by both genders. The extent of gender-specific speciality preferences seemed related to the male-to-female ratio in the study population. When a population contained more male students gynaecology seemed even more preferred by women, while in a more feminine population, men more highly preferred surgery. Internationally, throughout medical education, gender-related speciality preferences are apparent. The extent might be influenced by the male-to-female ratio of a study population. Further research of the role of gender in career considerations of medical students on the future workforce is necessary.

Identifiers

PMID24980516
PMCPMC4078047
OpenAlexW2124841448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.