ReviewDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2014
Plant rDNA database: update and new features.
Review in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Chromosome Number and rDNA Loci Evolution inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Five Fabaceae Karyotype and Phylogenetic Relationship Analysis Based on Oligo-FISH for 5S rDNA and (AGGenes · 2022Article
- The Nuclear 35S rDNA World in Plant Systematics and Evolution: A Primer of Cautions and Common Misconceptions in Cytogenetic Studies.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Comparative Chromosomal Localization of 45S and 5S rDNA Sites in 76 Purple-Fleshed Sweet Potato Cultivars.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Different from tracheophytes, liverworts commonly have mixed 35S and 5S arrays.Annals of botany · 2020Article
- Comparative molecular cytogenetic characterization of five wildComparative cytogenetics · 2020Article
- Comparative Dissection of Three Giant Genomes:International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Liriodendron genome sheds light on angiosperm phylogeny and species-pair differentiation.Nature plants · 2019Article
- The long-range interaction map of ribosomal DNA arrays.PLoS genetics · 2018Article
- High and uneven levels of 45S rDNA site-number variation across wild populations of a diploid plant genus (Anacyclus, Asteraceae).PloS one · 2017Article
- The Cerrado (Brazil) plant cytogenetics database.Comparative cytogenetics · 2017Article
- A Portrait of Ribosomal DNA Contacts with Hi-C Reveals 5S and 45S rDNA Anchoring Points in the Folded Human Genome.Genome biology and evolution · 2016Article
- rDNA Loci Evolution in the Genus Glechoma (Lamiaceae).PloS one · 2016Article
- The striking and unexpected cytogenetic diversity of genus Tanacetum L. (Asteraceae): a cytometric and fluorescent in situ hybridisation study of Iranian taxa.BMC plant biology · 2015Article
- Chromatin organization and cytological features of carnivorous Genlisea species with large genome size differences.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Article
- A proposal for a multivariate quantitative approach to infer karyological relationships among taxa.Comparative cytogenetics · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Plant rDNA database (www.plantrdnadatabase.com) is an open access online resource providing detailed information on numbers, structures and positions of 5S and 18S-5.8S-26S (35S) ribosomal DNA loci. The data have been obtained from >600 publications on plant molecular cytogenetics, mostly based on fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). This edition of the database contains information on 1609 species derived from 2839 records, which means an expansion of 55.76 and 94.45%, respectively. It holds the data for angiosperms, gymnosperms, bryophytes and pteridophytes available as of June 2013. Information from publications reporting data for a single rDNA (either 5S or 35S alone) and annotation regarding transcriptional activity of 35S loci now appears in the database. Preliminary analyses suggest greater variability in the number of rDNA loci in gymnosperms than in angiosperms. New applications provide ideograms of the species showing the positions of rDNA loci as well as a visual representation of their genome sizes. We have also introduced other features to boost the usability of the Web interface, such as an application for convenient data export and a new section with rDNA-FISH-related information (mostly detailing protocols and reagents). In addition, we upgraded and/or proofread tabs and links and modified the website for a more dynamic appearance. This manuscript provides a synopsis of these changes and developments. DATABASE URL: http://www.plantrdnadatabase.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.