Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24979804›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Automated identification of stratifying signatures in cellular subpopulations.

Robert V Bruggner, Bernd Bodenmiller, David L Dill, Robert J Tibshirani, Garry P Nolan

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 256 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
256citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

256 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Critical illness expands a transcriptionally distinct hypometabolic CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

196 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Robert V BruggnerBiomedical Informatics Training Program, Stanford University Medical School, Stanford, CA 94305;Baxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and.
Bernd BodenmillerInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
David L DillDepartments of Computer Science.
Robert J TibshiraniHealth Research and Policy, andStatistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; and tibs@stanford.edu gnolan@stanford.edu.
Garry P NolanBaxter Laboratory for Stem Cell Biology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and tibs@stanford.edu gnolan@stanford.edu.

Funding

Using a tonsil organoid system to probe conditions for the induction of protective antibody and T cell responses to influenza.U19AI057229 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Mark Morris Davis · 2003 to 2026
$88.5M
Spectrum Stanford Center for clinical and Translational Research and EducationUL1TR001085 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CULLEN, MARK RICHARD, GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2013 to 2017
$37.1M
POSTDOCTORAL TRAINING IN MEDICAL INFORMATION SCIENCEST15LM007033 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SYLVIA KATINA PLEVRITIS · 1985 to 2026
$25.5M
Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Education and Research (SCCTER)UL1UL1RR025744 · NCRR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GREENBERG, HARRY BERNARD · 2008 to 2011
$22.4M
TRIGGERING CELL DEATH IN B CELL LYMPHOMAP01CA034233 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 1985 to 2010
$19.5M
TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HILLIS, WILLIAM DANIEL · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
MODELING THE ROLE OF PROGRESSION IN FOLLICULAR LYMPHOMAU54CA149145 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W · 2010 to 2014
$12.1M
The Center for Systemic Control of Cyto-NetworksPN2EY018228 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HO, CHIH-MING · 2006 to 2010
$8.2M
Software & Hardware Inference Engines for Automated Determination of Primary CellR01CA130826 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2008 to 2011
$6.7M
PLATELET INTERACTIONS WITH FIBRINOGEN AND CALCIUMR01HL028183 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PEERSCHKE, ELLINOR I · 1985 to 1992
–
MECHANISTIC STUDIES IN THE BIOSYNTHESIS OF ACETYLENESF32CA009011 · NCI · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI CASEBIER, DAVID S · 1990 to 1992
–
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28183N01HV028183 · HV · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2002 to 2006
–
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001085NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA130826NCI NIH HHS 5U54CA143907NCI NIH HHS P01 CA034233NCI NIH HHS P01 CA034233-22A1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA130826NCI NIH HHS RFA CA 09-009NCI NIH HHS RFA CA 09 011NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907NCI NIH HHS U54 CA149145NCI NIH HHS U54CA149145NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025744NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR025744NEI NIH HHS PN2 EY018228NEI NIH HHS PN2EY018228NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-00242NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028183NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-28183NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272200700038CNIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057229NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007033PHS HHS HHSF223201210194C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Elucidation and examination of cellular subpopulations that display condition-specific behavior can play a critical contributory role in understanding disease mechanism, as well as provide a focal point for development of diagnostic criteria linking such a mechanism to clinical prognosis. Despite recent advancements in single-cell measurement technologies, the identification of relevant cell subsets through manual efforts remains standard practice. As new technologies such as mass cytometry increase the parameterization of single-cell measurements, the scalability and subjectivity inherent in manual analyses slows both analysis and progress. We therefore developed Citrus (cluster identification, characterization, and regression), a data-driven approach for the identification of stratifying subpopulations in multidimensional cytometry datasets. The methodology of Citrus is demonstrated through the identification of known and unexpected pathway responses in a dataset of stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells measured by mass cytometry. Additionally, the performance of Citrus is compared with that of existing methods through the analysis of several publicly available datasets. As the complexity of flow cytometry datasets continues to increase, methods such as Citrus will be needed to aid investigators in the performance of unbiased--and potentially more thorough--correlation-based mining and inspection of cell subsets nested within high-dimensional datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftwareBlood CellsCellsComputational BiologyFlow CytometryHumansT-Lymphocyte Subsetsbiomarker discoveryinformatics

Identifiers

PMID24979804
PMCPMC4084463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.