Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24979764›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Cell cycle dependent oscillatory expression of estrogen receptor-α links Pol II elongation to neoplastic transformation.

Cristina Vantaggiato, Marta Tocchetti, Vera Cappelletti, Aymone Gurtner, Alessandro Villa, Maria Grazia Daidone, Giulia Piaggio, Adriana Maggi, Paolo Ciana

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Bioluminescence imaging of estrogen receptor activity during breast cancer progression.American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cristina VantaggiatoCenter of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
Marta TocchettiCenter of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
Vera CappellettiDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; and.
Aymone GurtnerExperimental Oncology Department, Istituto Regina Elena, 00158 Rome, Italy.
Alessandro VillaCenter of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
Maria Grazia DaidoneDepartment of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy; and.
Giulia PiaggioExperimental Oncology Department, Istituto Regina Elena, 00158 Rome, Italy.
Adriana MaggiCenter of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
Paolo CianaCenter of Excellence on Neurodegenerative Diseases and Department of Pharmacological Sciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy; paolo.ciana@unimi.it.
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITIstituto di Sessuologia Clinica · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of studies provided a detailed view of the mechanism of estrogen receptor-α (ERα) regulated gene transcription and the physio-pathological relevance of the genetic programs controlled by this receptor in a variety of tissues. However, still limited is our knowledge on the regulation of ERα synthesis. Preliminary observations showed that the expression of ERα is cell cycle regulated. Here, we have demonstrated that a well described polymorphic sequence in the first intron of ERα (PvuII and XbaI) has a key role in regulating the ERα content in cycling cells. We have shown that the RNA Pol II (Pol II) elongation is blocked at the polymorphic site and that the proto-oncogene c-MYB modulates the release of the pausing polymerase. It is well known that the two SNPs are associated to an increased risk, progression, survival and mortality of endocrine-related cancers, here we have demonstrated that the c-MYB-dependent release of Pol II at a specific phase of the cell cycle is facilitated by the px haplotype, thus leading to a higher ERα mitogenic signal. In breast cancer, this mechanism is disrupted when the hormone refractory phenotype is established; therefore, we propose this oscillator as a novel target for the development of therapies aimed at sensitizing breast cancer resistant to hormonal treatments. Because PvuII and XbaI were associated to a broad range physio-pathological conditions beside neoplastic transformation, we expect that the ERα oscillator contributes to the regulation of the estrogen signal in several tissues.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceCell CycleCell Transformation, NeoplasticChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNA PrimersEstrogen Receptor alphaGene Expression RegulationGenotypeHumansMCF-7 CellsPlasmidsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProto-Oncogene MasReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA Polymerase IIDNA PrimersESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaMAS1 protein, humanProto-Oncogene MasRNA Polymerase IIgenetic polymorphismsoscillatory gene expressionpolymerase blockagesteroid receptorstranscriptional oscillators

Identifiers

PMID24979764
PMCPMC4084491
OpenAlexW2030233235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.