ArticlePloS one2014
Decoding of visual attention from LFP signals of macaque MT.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Signal acquisition of brain-computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review.Fundamental research · 2025Review
- Article
- Coupled oscillations orchestrate selective information transmission in visual cortex.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Dissociation of attentional state and behavioral outcome using local field potentials.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Decoding of attentional state using local field potentials.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2022Review
- Sensory representation of visual stimuli in the coupling of low-frequency phase to spike times.Brain structure & function · 2022Article
- Beyond the brain-computer interface: Decoding brain activity as a tool to understand neuronal mechanisms subtending cognition and behavior.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Attention strengthens across-trial pre-stimulus phase coherence in visual cortex, enhancing stimulus processing.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Decoding Adaptive Visuomotor Behavior Mediated by Non-linear Phase Coupling in Macaque Area MT.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Commentary: The causal role of α-oscillations in feature binding.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Routing information flow by separate neural synchrony frequencies allows for "functionally labeled lines" in higher primate cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Attention decouples action potentials from the phase of local field potentials in macaque visual cortical area MT.BMC biology · 2018Article
- Real-time decoding of covert attention in higher-order visual areas.NeuroImage · 2018Article
- Local field potentials are induced by visually evoked spiking activity in macaque cortical area MT.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Effect of Subliminal Lexical Priming on the Subjective Perception of Images: A Machine Learning Approach.PloS one · 2016Article
- Evaluation of local field potential signals in decoding of visual attention.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2015Article
- Single-Trial Decoding of Visual Attention from Local Field Potentials in the Primate Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Is Frequency-Dependent.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015Article
- Attention Decreases Phase-Amplitude Coupling, Enhancing Stimulus Discriminability in Cortical Area MT.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The local field potential (LFP) has recently been widely used in brain computer interfaces (BCI). Here we used power of LFP recorded from area MT of a macaque monkey to decode where the animal covertly attended. Support vector machines (SVM) were used to learn the pattern of power at different frequencies for attention to two possible positions. We found that LFP power at both low (<9 Hz) and high (31-120 Hz) frequencies contains sufficient information to decode the focus of attention. Highest decoding performance was found for gamma frequencies (31-120 Hz) and reached 82%. In contrast low frequencies (<9 Hz) could help the classifier reach a higher decoding performance with a smaller amount of training data. Consequently, we suggest that low frequency LFP can provide fast but coarse information regarding the focus of attention, while higher frequencies of the LFP deliver more accurate but less timely information about the focus of attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.