Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24979216›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The reward-based eating drive scale: a self-report index of reward-based eating.

Elissa S Epel, A Janet Tomiyama, Ashley E Mason, Barbara A Laraia, William Hartman, Karen Ready, Michael Acree, Tanja C Adam, Sachiko St Jeor, David Kessler

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02694731 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

A Mindfulness Mobile Intervention Targeting Reductions in Food Cravings

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2016 to 2016Enrolled104ConditionsFood CravingsArmsMobile application intervention (Device: Smartphone)
NCT05347914 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Mobile Mindfulness Intervention to Reduce Non-Homeostatic Food Cravings in Emotional Eaters: Research Pilot

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled49ConditionsEmotional EatingArmsMindfulness
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The battle over "food addiction".Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Elissa S EpelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America; UCSF Center for Obesity Assessment, Study, & Treatment, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
A Janet TomiyamaUCSF Center for Obesity Assessment, Study, & Treatment, San Francisco, California, United States of America; Department of Psychology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Ashley E MasonUCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Barbara A LaraiaUCSF Center for Obesity Assessment, Study, & Treatment, San Francisco, California, United States of America; School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
William HartmanMD Weight Management Program, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Karen ReadyMD Weight Management Program, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Michael AcreeUCSF Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Tanja C AdamDepartment of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Sachiko St JeorDivision of Endocrinology Nutrition and Metabolism, University of Nevada School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, United States of America.
David KesslerDepartment of Pediatrics, UCSF School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Osher Center for Integrative MedicineUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWashington Center for Weight Management and Research · USMaastricht University · NLUniversity of California, Berkeley · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · US

Funding

Training Researchers in Clinical Integrative Medicine (TRIM) - NOSI supplementT32AT003997 · NCCIH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHELLEY R ADLER, MARIA T CHAO · 2007 to 2026
$6.6M
Novel interventions to reduce stress induced non-homeostatic eatingU01HL097973 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ADLER, NANCY E, EPEL, ELISSA S. · 2009 to 2014
$5.7M
NCCIH NIH HHS T32 AT003997NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL097973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Why are some individuals more vulnerable to persistent weight gain and obesity than are others? Some obese individuals report factors that drive overeating, including lack of control, lack of satiation, and preoccupation with food, which may stem from reward-related neural circuitry. These are normative and common symptoms and not the sole focus of any existing measures. Many eating scales capture these common behaviors, but are confounded with aspects of dysregulated eating such as binge eating or emotional overeating. Across five studies, we developed items that capture this reward-based eating drive (RED). Study 1 developed the items in lean to obese individuals (n = 327) and examined changes in weight over eight years. In Study 2, the scale was further developed and expert raters evaluated the set of items. Study 3 tested psychometric properties of the final 9 items in 400 participants. Study 4 examined psychometric properties and race invariance (n = 80 women). Study 5 examined psychometric properties and age/gender invariance (n = 381). Results showed that RED scores correlated with BMI and predicted earlier onset of obesity, greater weight fluctuations, and greater overall weight gain over eight years. Expert ratings of RED scale items indicated that the items reflected characteristics of reward-based eating. The RED scale evidenced high internal consistency and invariance across demographic factors. The RED scale, designed to tap vulnerability to reward-based eating behavior, appears to be a useful brief tool for identifying those at higher risk of weight gain over time. Given the heterogeneity of obesity, unique brief profiling of the reward-based aspect of obesity using a self-report instrument such as the RED scale may be critical for customizing effective treatments in the general population.

Indexed as

DriveRewardAdultAgedBody WeightFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansHyperphagiaMaleMiddle AgedObesitySelf Report

Identifiers

PMID24979216
PMCPMC4076308
OpenAlexW2045665532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.