Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24979210›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2014

Non-invasive delivery of stealth, brain-penetrating nanoparticles across the blood-brain barrier using MRI-guided focused ultrasound.

Elizabeth Nance, Kelsie Timbie, G Wilson Miller, Ji Song, Cameron Louttit, Alexander L Klibanov, Ting-Yu Shih, Ganesh Swaminathan, Rafael J Tamargo, Graeme F Woodworth and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Sonoselective Transfection of Glioma Endothelium.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Hypothalamic wars: the last nanodelivery.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nano-Based Technology in Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Glioblastoma Therapy: Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elizabeth Nance *Center for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231 (USA).
Kelsie Timbie *Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).
G Wilson MillerDepartment of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).
Ji SongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).
Cameron LouttitDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).
Alexander L KlibanovDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).
Ting-Yu ShihDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 (USA).
Ganesh SwaminathanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 (USA).
Rafael J TamargoCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231 (USA).
Graeme F WoodworthDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201 (USA).
Justin HanesCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231 (USA).
Richard J PriceDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 (USA).

Funding

Women's Oncology Program - WONP30CA044579 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Thomas P. Loughran · 1987 to 2026
$72.1M
BASIC CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH TRAINING GRANTT32HL007284 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE · PI Brant E Isakson, Gary K Owens · 1985 to 2026
$19.6M
Brain Tumor-Penetrating Nanoparticle Delivery with MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR01CA164789 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HANES, JUSTIN S., PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2012 to 2016
$3.1M
T-32 NIH Postdoctoral Training Program in Nanotechnology for Cancer Medicine NTCMT32CA130840 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI WIRTZ, DENIS · 2008 to 2012
$1.2M
Brain-Penetrating Nanoparticle Therapeutics for Invasive Brain CancerK08NS090430 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI WOODWORTH, GRAEME F · 2014 to 2018
$748k
Bevacizumab Delivery to Glioblastoma with MR-Guided Focused UltrasoundR03EB016784 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PRICE, RICHARD J. · 2013 to 2014
$150k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA044579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164789NCI NIH HHS T32 CA130840NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007284NIBIB NIH HHS R03 EB016784NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS090430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) presents a significant obstacle for the treatment of many central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including invasive brain tumors, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and stroke. Therapeutics must be capable of bypassing the BBB and also penetrate the brain parenchyma to achieve a desired effect within the brain. In this study, we test the unique combination of a non-invasive approach to BBB permeabilization with a therapeutically relevant polymeric nanoparticle platform capable of rapidly penetrating within the brain microenvironment. MR-guided focused ultrasound (FUS) with intravascular microbubbles (MBs) is able to locally and reversibly disrupt the BBB with submillimeter spatial accuracy. Densely poly(ethylene-co-glycol) (PEG) coated, brain-penetrating nanoparticles (BPNs) are long-circulating and diffuse 10-fold slower in normal rat brain tissue compared to diffusion in water. Following intravenous administration of model and biodegradable BPNs in normal healthy rats, we demonstrate safe, pressure-dependent delivery of 60nm BPNs to the brain parenchyma in regions where the BBB is disrupted by FUS and MBs. Delivery of BPNs with MR-guided FUS has the potential to improve efficacy of treatments for many CNS diseases, while reducing systemic side effects by providing sustained, well-dispersed drug delivery into select regions of the brain.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCarbocyaninesFluorescent DyesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMicrobubblesNanoparticlesPolymersRats, Sprague-DawleyUltrasonicsAlexa Fluor 647CarbocyaninesFluorescent DyesPolymersCentral nervous systemFocused ultrasoundNanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID24979210
PMCPMC4125545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.