Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24978871›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2014

An augmented-reality edge enhancement application for Google Glass.

Alex D Hwang, Eli Peli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. CookAR: Affordance Augmentations in Wearable AR to Support Kitchen Tool Interactions for People with Low Vision.Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · 2024
    Article
  5. Seeing the Future: A Review of Ocular Therapy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Design considerations for the ideal low vision aid: insights from de-brief interviews following a real-world recording study.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Effect of a Head-mounted Low Vision Device on Visual Function.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018
    Article
  17. Using an Augmented Reality Device as a Distance-based Vision Aid-Promise and Limitations.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alex D Hwang*PhD †OD, MSc, FAAO Schepens Eye Research Institute, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts (both authors).
Eli Peli

Funding

ENGINEERING APPROACHES TO LOW VISION REHABILITATIONR01EY012890 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PELI, ELI · 2006 to 2010
$7.0M
MODEL-BASED IMAGE ENHANCEMENT FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIREDR01EY005957 · NEI · SCHEPENS EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI PELI, ELI · 1986 to 2013
$5.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005957NEI NIH HHS R01EY005957NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012890NEI NIH HHS R01EY012890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGoogle Glass provides a platform that can be easily extended to include a vision enhancement tool. We have implemented an augmented vision system on Glass, which overlays enhanced edge information over the wearer's real-world view, to provide contrast-improved central vision to the Glass wearers. The enhanced central vision can be naturally integrated with scanning.

methodsGoogle Glass' camera lens distortions were corrected by using an image warping. Because the camera and virtual display are horizontally separated by 16 mm, and the camera aiming and virtual display projection angle are off by 10°, the warped camera image had to go through a series of three-dimensional transformations to minimize parallax errors before the final projection to the Glass' see-through virtual display. All image processes were implemented to achieve near real-time performance. The impacts of the contrast enhancements were measured for three normal-vision subjects, with and without a diffuser film to simulate vision loss.

resultsFor all three subjects, significantly improved contrast sensitivity was achieved when the subjects used the edge enhancements with a diffuser film. The performance boost is limited by the Glass camera's performance. The authors assume that this accounts for why performance improvements were observed only with the diffuser filter condition (simulating low vision).

conclusionsImprovements were measured with simulated visual impairments. With the benefit of see-through augmented reality edge enhancement, natural visual scanning process is possible and suggests that the device may provide better visual function in a cosmetically and ergonomically attractive format for patients with macular degeneration.

Indexed as

Optical DevicesSensory AidsUser-Computer InterfaceAdultContrast SensitivityHumansImage EnhancementMacular DegenerationMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsVision, Low

Identifiers

PMID24978871
PMCPMC4111789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.