ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2014
Maximizing the clinical utility of antimüllerian hormone testing in women's health.
Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preconception ovarian reserve and placenta-mediated pregnancy complications among infertile women.Pregnancy hypertension · 2022Trial
- Clinical utility of anti-Müllerian hormone in female children and adolescents.Hormones (Athens, Greece) · 2025Review
- Development of a quantitative fluorescence lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) prototype for point-of-need detection of anti-Müllerian hormone.Practical laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Variation in the Measurement of Anti-Müllerian Hormone - What Are the Laboratory Issues?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Lower antimüllerian hormone is associated with lower oocyte yield but not live-birth rate among women with obesity.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2020Article
- Reduced ovarian reserve in young early breast cancer patients: preliminary data from a prospective cohort trial.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Improving Health Education for Women Who Carry an FMR1 Premutation.Journal of genetic counseling · 2016Article
- Evidence of an age-related correlation of ovarian reserve and FMR1 repeat number among women with "normal" CGG repeat status.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2015Article
- Is AMH Level, Independent of Age, a Predictor of Live Birth in IVF?Journal of human reproductive sciencesArticle
- Can anti-Mullerian hormone replace ultrasonographic evaluation in polycystic ovary syndrome? A review of current progress.Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolismReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo provide an update on the latest clinical applications of serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) testing with practical approaches to mitigate the impact of significant variability in AMH results. RECENT
findingsRecent studies continue to demonstrate that AMH is the best single serum test for ovarian response management with, at most, a weak-to-moderate age-independent association with live-birth rate and time to conception. Data confirm serum AMH levels improve menopause prediction, monitoring of ovarian damage, and identification of women at risk for several ovary-related disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome and premature or primary ovarian insufficiency. However, it is now recognized that serum AMH results can have dramatic variability due to common, biologic fluctuations within some individuals, use of hormonal contraceptives or other medications, certain surgical procedures, specimen treatment, assay changes, and laboratory calibration differences. Practical guidelines are provided to minimize the impact of variability in AMH results and maximize the accuracy of clinical decision-making. SUMMARY: AMH is an ovarian biomarker of central importance which improves the clinical management of women's health. However, with the simultaneous rapid expansion of AMH clinical applications and recognition of variability in AMH results, consensus regarding the clinical cutpoints is increasingly difficult. Therefore, a careful approach to AMH measurement and interpretation in clinical care is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.