Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24978641›Full record

ReviewLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2014

Melanoma epigenetics: novel mechanisms, markers, and medicines.

Jonathan J Lee, George F Murphy, Christine G Lian

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Phytochemicals as Immunomodulatory Agents in Melanoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Are Alterations in DNA Methylation Related to CKD Development?International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan J LeeProgram in Dermatopathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
George F MurphyProgram in Dermatopathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Christine G LianProgram in Dermatopathology, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Targeting Raf in Melanoma: Mechanisms for Effect & Resistance & Opportunities forP50CA093683 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GOLUB, TODD R. · 2001 to 2012
$25.8M
Immunology of human malignant melanoma initiating cellsR01CA158467 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRANK, MARKUS H., HODI, FRANK S · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Melanoma Stem Cells, Vasculogenesis and Neoplastic ProgressionR01CA138231 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI FRANK, MARKUS H. · 2008 to 2012
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS 5P50CA093683NCI NIH HHS P50 CA093683NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138231NCI NIH HHS R01 CA158467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma continue to increase worldwide, despite the deployment of targeted therapies. Recently, there has been rapid growth and development in our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms and their role in cancer pathobiology. Epigenetics--defined as the processes resulting in heritable changes in gene expression beyond those caused by alterations in the DNA sequence--likely contain the information that encodes for such phenotypic variation between individuals with identical genotypes. By altering the structure of chromatin through covalent modification of DNA bases or histone proteins, or by regulating mRNA translation through non-coding RNAs, the epigenome ultimately determines which genes are expressed and which are kept silent. While our understanding of epigenetic mechanisms is growing at a rapid pace, the field of melanoma epigenomics still remains in its infancy. In this Pathology in Focus, we will briefly review the basics of epigenetics to contextualize and critically examine the existing literature using melanoma as a cancer paradigm. Our understanding of how dysregulated DNA methylation and DNA demethylation/hydroxymethylation, histone modification, and non-coding RNAs affect cancer pathogenesis and melanoma virulence, in particular, provides us with an ever-expanding repertoire of potential diagnostic biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and novel pathogenic mechanisms. The evidence reviewed herein indicates the critical role of epigenetic mechanisms in melanoma pathobiology and provides evidence for future targets in the development of next-generation biomarkers and therapeutics.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMolecular Targeted TherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA MethylationDNA, NeoplasmEpigenesis, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesHumansMelanomaMicroRNAsNeoplasm ProteinsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersDNA (Cytosine-5-)-MethyltransferasesDNA, NeoplasmHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesMicroRNAsNeoplasm ProteinsRNA, NeoplasmRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID24978641
PMCPMC4479581
OpenAlexW2066407657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.