Trial reportThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Who Signs Up for and Engages in a Peer Support Heart Failure Self-management Intervention.
Trial report in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Social network interventions to support cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in the management of people with heart disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Peer Coaching to Improve Diabetes Self-Management Among Low-Income Black Veteran Men: A Mixed Methods Assessment of Enrollment and Engagement.Annals of family medicineTrial
- Evaluating Cardiovascular Patient Support Groups: A Cross-Sectional Control-Group Questionnaire Study of Patients and Healthcare Providers.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Review
- Self-Care Interventions That Reduce Hospital Readmissions in Patients With Heart Failure; Towards the Identification of Change Agents.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2019Review
- The Role of Clinical Psychology and Peer to Peer Support in the Management of Chronic Medical Conditions - A Practical Example With Adults With Congenital Heart Disease.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMany programs for patients with heart failure (HF) fail to improve clinical outcomes in part because of low rates of patient enrollment and engagement. A better understanding of patient characteristics associated with willingness to enroll and then engage in HF self-management programs will improve the design and targeting of programs. METHODS AND
resultsAnalyses of screening, baseline, and engagement data from a randomized controlled effectiveness trial of an HF peer self-management support program were conducted. The median age of the 266 recently hospitalized HF patients who enrolled in the study was 69 years, 51% were female, and 26% were minorities (primarily African American). Of 135 randomized to the peer support intervention, only 39% engaged in either the group sessions or telephone peer support calls. Older white women who reported higher baseline health status, functioning, social support, and confidence in their ability to manage and less difficulty with the physical and emotional aspects of living with HF were the most likely to engage in program activities. Minority status and reporting a need for social support were both correlated with higher enrollment but lower engagement in the intervention.
conclusionsAlthough minority patients with poorer reported health status and social support were most likely to consent to participate in the study, participants who engaged in program activities were more likely to have higher baseline health status, functioning, and social support. Developing HF interventions that successfully engage participants most in need of HF self-management support remains a difficult challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.