Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24978113›Full record

ReviewSmall GTPases2014

Rho GTPases: masters of cell migration.

Amine Sadok, Chris J Marshall

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Small GTPases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 115 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 206 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Tunneling Nanotubes in the Brain.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  13. TheFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Potential Role of AGR2 for Mammalian Skin Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. ERK3 and DGKζ interact to modulate cell motility in lung cancer cells.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Amine SadokThe Institute of Cancer Research; Division of Cancer Biology; London, UK.
Chris J MarshallThe Institute of Cancer Research; Division of Cancer Biology; London, UK.
Centre for Cancer Biology · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16512
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since their discovery in the late eighties, the role of Rho GTPases in the regulation of cell migration has been extensively studied and has mainly focused on the hallmark family members Rho, Rac, and Cdc42. Recent technological advances in cell biology, such as Rho-family GTPase activity biosensors, studies in 3D, and unbiased RNAi-based screens, have revealed an increasingly complex role for Rho GTPases during cell migration, with many inter-connected functions and a strong dependency on the physical and chemical properties of the surrounding environment. This review aims to give an overview of recent studies on the role of Rho-family GTPase members in the modulation of cell migration in different environments, and discuss future directions.

Indexed as

ActinsAnimalscdc42 GTP-Binding ProteinCell MovementHumansrac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho-Associated Kinasesrho GTP-Binding ProteinsActinscdc42 GTP-Binding Proteinrac GTP-Binding Proteinsrho-Associated Kinasesrho GTP-Binding Proteinscell migrationmicroenvironmentRho GTPases

Identifiers

PMID24978113
PMCPMC4107589
OpenAlexW2010735936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.