ArticleBehavioural brain research2014
Methamphetamine drinking microstructure in mice bred to drink high or low amounts of methamphetamine.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- FARESHARE: An open-source apparatus for assessing drinking microstructure in socially housed rats.NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience · 2024Article
- Robust aversive effects of trace amine-associated receptor 1 activation in mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Article
- Midazolam, methamphetamine, morphine and nicotine intake in high-drinking-in-the-dark mice.Addiction biology · 2022Article
- The motivational valence of methamphetamine relates inversely to subsequent methamphetamine self-administration in female C57BL/6J mice.Behavioural brain research · 2021Article
- Confirmation of a CausalFrontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Non-genetic factors that influence methamphetamine intake in a genetic model of differential methamphetamine consumption.Psychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake confers differential sensitivity to the temperature-altering effects of other addictive drugs.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2020Article
- Linking Delay Discounting and Substance Use Disorders: Genotypes and Phenotypes.Perspectives on behavior science · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Depression-like symptoms of withdrawal in a genetic mouse model of binge methamphetamine intake.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019Article
- Characterizing ingestive behavior through licking microstructure: Underlying neurobiology and its use in the study of obesity in animal models.International journal of developmental neuroscience : the official journal of the International Society for Developmental Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Prefrontal glutamate correlates of methamphetamine sensitization and preference.The European journal of neuroscience · 2016Article
- A Mouse Model for Binge-Level Methamphetamine Use.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Commonalities and Distinctions Among Mechanisms of Addiction to Alcohol and Other Drugs.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2015Review
- An animal model of differential genetic risk for methamphetamine intake.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2015Review
- Vitamin D3: A Role in Dopamine Circuit Regulation, Diet-Induced Obesity, and Drug Consumption.eNeuroArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genetic factors likely influence individual sensitivity to positive and negative effects of methamphetamine (MA) and risk for MA dependence. Genetic influence on MA consumption has been confirmed by selectively breeding mouse lines to consume high (MAHDR) or low (MALDR) amounts of MA, using a two-bottle choice MA drinking (MADR) procedure. Here, we employed a lickometer system to characterize the microstructure of MA (20, 40, and 80mg/l) and water intake in MAHDR and MALDR mice in 4-h limited access sessions, during the initial 4hours of the dark phase of their 12:12h light:dark cycle. Licks at one-minute intervals and total volume consumed were recorded, and bout analysis was performed. MAHDR and MALDR mice consumed similar amounts of MA in mg/kg on the first day of access, but MAHDR mice consumed significantly more MA than MALDR mice during all subsequent sessions. The higher MA intake of MAHDR mice was associated with a larger number of MA bouts, longer bout duration, shorter interbout interval, and shorter latency to the first bout. In a separate 4-h limited access MA drinking study, MALDR and MAHDR mice had similar blood MA levels on the first day MA was offered, but MAHDR mice had higher blood MA levels on all subsequent days, which corresponded with MA intake. These data provide insight into the microstructure of MA intake in an animal model of differential genetic risk for MA consumption, which may be pertinent to MA use patterns relevant to genetic risk for MA dependence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.