Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24977159›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Epigenetic alterations of chromosome 3 revealed by NotI-microarrays in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Alexey A Dmitriev, Evgeniya E Rudenko, Anna V Kudryavtseva, George S Krasnov, Vasily V Gordiyuk, Nataliya V Melnikova, Eduard O Stakhovsky, Oleksii A Kononenko, Larissa S Pavlova, Tatiana T Kondratieva and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Alexey A DmitrievEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia ; P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow 125284, Russia.
Evgeniya E RudenkoInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev 03680, Ukraine.
Anna V KudryavtsevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia ; P.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow 125284, Russia.
George S KrasnovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia ; Mechnikov Research Institute for Vaccines and Sera, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 105064, Russia.
Vasily V GordiyukInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev 03680, Ukraine.
Nataliya V MelnikovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Eduard O StakhovskyNational Cancer Institute, Kiev 03022, Ukraine.
Oleksii A KononenkoNational Cancer Institute, Kiev 03022, Ukraine.
Larissa S PavlovaN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Tatiana T KondratievaN.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Boris Y AlekseevP.A. Herzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow 125284, Russia.
Eleonora A BragaInstitute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 125315, Russia ; Research Center of Medical Genetics, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow 115478, Russia.
Vera N SenchenkoEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Vladimir I KashubaInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Ukrainian Academy of Sciences, Kiev 03680, Ukraine ; Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Karolinska Institute, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology · RUInstitute of Molecular Biology and Genetics · UANational Cancer Institute · UAP.A. Hertzen Moscow Oncology Research Institute · RUKarolinska Institutet · SEMinistry of Health of the Russian Federation · RUResearch Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology, the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RUResearch Institute of Vaccines and Sera. Mechnikov of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to clarify epigenetic and genetic alterations that occur during renal carcinogenesis. The original method includes chromosome 3 specific NotI-microarrays containing 180 NotI-clones associated with 188 genes for hybridization with 23 paired normal/tumor DNA samples of primary clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC). Twenty-two genes showed methylation and/or deletion in 17-57% of tumors. These genes include tumor suppressors or candidates (VHL, CTDSPL, LRRC3B, ALDH1L1, and EPHB1) and genes that were not previously considered as cancer-associated (e.g., LRRN1, GORASP1, FGD5, and PLCL2). Bisulfite sequencing analysis confirmed methylation as a frequent event in ccRCC. A set of six markers (NKIRAS1/RPL15, LRRN1, LRRC3B, CTDSPL, GORASP1/TTC21A, and VHL) was suggested for ccRCC detection in renal biopsies. The mRNA level decrease was shown for 6 NotI-associated genes in ccRCC using quantitative PCR: LRRN1, GORASP1, FOXP1, FGD5, PLCL2, and ALDH1L1. The majority of examined genes showed distinct expression profiles in ccRCC and papillary RCC. The strongest extent and frequency of downregulation were shown for ALDH1L1 gene both in ccRCC and papillary RCC. Moreover, the extent of ALDH1L1 mRNA level decrease was more pronounced in both histological types of RCC stage III compared with stages I and II (P = 0.03). The same was observed for FGD5 gene in ccRCC (P < 0.06). Dedicated to thememory of Eugene R. Zabarovsky.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellChromosome DeletionChromosomes, Human, Pair 3Epigenesis, GeneticGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHumansKidney NeoplasmsNeoplasm ProteinsOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisGenetic MarkersNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24977159
PMCPMC4054851
OpenAlexW2067086421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.