Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24977111›Full record

ArticleCurrent hepatology reports2014

Hepatic steatosis and steatohepatitis: Are they really two distinct entities?

Cory M Fielding, Paul Angulo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current hepatology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cory M FieldingDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 304B Charles T. Wethington Bldg., 900 South Limestone, Lexington, KY 40536-0200, (859) 323-9918 office, (859) 323-1197 fax, cory.fielding@uky.edu.
Paul AnguloDivision of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 800 Rose Street, Room MN649, Lexington, KY 40536-0298, (859) 323-3555 office, (859) 257-8860 fax, paul.angulo@uky.edu.
University of Kentucky · US

Funding

Prognosis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseR01DK082426 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI ANGULO, PAUL · 2009 to 2011
$526k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK082426
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease affects nearly 30% of Americans. A histopathological spectrum exists from simple steatosis to NASH which may progress to cirrhosis and HCC. NASH is currently the third most common indication for liver transplant with increasing incidence. Steatosis can be considered the hepatic manifestation of the metabolic syndrome as insulin resistance is a major risk factor for its development. While liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis, non-invasive methods are currently being developed to appropriately determine who needs histologic evaluation. Management focuses on mitigation of risk factors, since targeted therapies to halt progression of fibrosis have not been validated. Simple steatosis does not affect overall survival, but NASH conveys increased mortality. Because of this, non-invasive strategies to diagnose patients and management algorithms are needed. This review supports the definitions of simple steatosis and NASH as two distinct entities based on pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and prognosis.

Indexed as

cirrhosishepatitishepatocellularinsulin resistanceliverNAFLDNASHNon-alcoholic fatty liver diseasenon-alcoholic steatohepatitisobesityreviewsteatohepatitissteatosistransplant

Identifiers

PMID24977111
PMCPMC4066391
OpenAlexW2066062196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.