Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24976903›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2014

Laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment of weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy.

Giovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giovanni CesanaGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.
Matteo UccelliGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.
Francesca CiccareseGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.
Domenico CarrieriGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.
Giorgio CastelloGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.
Stefano OlmiGiovanni Cesana, Matteo Uccelli, Francesca Ciccarese, Domenico Carrieri, Giorgio Castello, Stefano Olmi, Department of General and Oncologic Surgery, Centre of Laparoscopic and Bariatric Surgery, Istituti Ospedalieri Bergamaschi-Policlinico San Marco, 24040 Zingonia-Osio Sotto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy as a treatment of weight regain after Sleeve.

methodsLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is a common bariatric procedure. Weight regain after long-term follow-up is reported. Patients were considered for laparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy when we observed progressive weight regain and persistence of comorbidities associated with evidence of dilated gastric fundus and/or antrum on upper gastro-intestinal series. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 1, 3, 6 and 12 mo after surgery and every 6 mo thereafter. Measures of change from baseline at different times were analyzed with the paired samples t test.

resultsWe observed progressive weight regain after sleeve in 11 of the 201 patients (5.4%) who had a mean follow-up of 21.1 ± 9.7 mo (range 6-57 mo). Three patients started to regain weight after 6 mo following Sleeve, 5 patients after 12 mo, 3 patients after 18 m. Re-sleeve gastrectomy was always performed by laparoscopy. The mean time of intervention was 55.8 ± 29.1 min. In all cases, neither intra-operative nor post-operative complications occurred. After 1 year follow-up we observed a significant (P < 0.05) mean body mass index reduction (-6.6 ± 2.7 kg/m(2)) and mean % excess weight loss (%EWL) increase (+31.0% ± 15.8%). An important reduction of antihypertensive drugs and hypoglycemic agents was observed after re-sleeve in those patients affected by hypertension and diabetes. Joint problems and sleep apnea syndrome improved in all 11 patients.

conclusionLaparoscopic re-sleeve gastrectomy is a feasible and effective intervention to correct weight regain after sleeve.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryGastrectomyLaparoscopic surgeryObesityRepeatStomach staplingSurgery

Identifiers

PMID24976903
PMCPMC4073220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.