Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24976856›Full record

ReviewNutrition & metabolism2014

Prostate cancer and the influence of dietary factors and supplements: a systematic review.

Dalvinder Mandair, Roberta Elisa Rossi, Marinos Pericleous, Tara Whyand, Martyn Evan Caplin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrition & metabolism, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Genetic Polymorphisms and Antioxidant Reactions in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Milk Consumption and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.The world journal of men's health · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Molecular Mechanisms and Bioavailability of Polyphenols in Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dalvinder MandairCentre for Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK ; Cancer Institute, University College London, Huntley Street, London, UK.
Roberta Elisa RossiCentre for Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK ; Department of Pathophysiology and Organ Transplant, Universita' degli Studi di Milano and Gastroenterology Unit II, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Marinos PericleousCentre for Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
Tara WhyandDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Martyn Evan CaplinCentre for Gastroenterology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProstate cancer is the second most common cause of cancer worldwide after lung cancer. There is increasing evidence that diet and lifestyle plays a crucial role in prostate cancer biology and tumourigenesis. Prostate cancer itself represents a good model of cancer in which to look for chemopreventive agents due to the high disease prevalence, slowly progressive nature, and long latency period. Dietary agents have gained considerable attention, often receiving much publicity in the media.

aimTo review the key evidence available for potential chemopreventive nutrients.

methodsThe methodology for this review involved a PubMed search from 1990 to 2013 using the key-words "diet and prostate cancer", "nutrition and prostate cancer", "dietary factors and prostate cancer", "prostate cancer epidemiology", "prostate cancer prevention", "prostate cancer progression".

resultsRed meat, dietary fat and milk intake should be minimised as they appear to increase the risk of prostate cancer. Fruit and vegetables and polyphenols may be preventive in prostate cancer, but further studies are needed to draw more solid conclusions and to clarify their role in patients with an established diagnosis of prostate cancer. Selenium and vitamin supplements cannot be advocated for the prevention of prostate cancer and indeed higher doses may be associated with a worse prognosis. There is no specific evidence regarding benefits of probiotics or prebiotics in prostate cancer.

conclusionsFrom the wealth of evidence available, many recommendations can be made although more randomised control trials are required. These need to be carefully designed due to the many confounding factors and heterogeneity of the population.

Indexed as

DietEpidemiologyNutritionProstate cancerTumour prevention

Identifiers

PMID24976856
PMCPMC4073189
OpenAlexW2133443143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.