Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24976749›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of manual & manipulative therapy2014

The efficacy of manual therapy and exercise for different stages of non-specific low back pain: an update of systematic reviews.

Benjamin Hidalgo, Christine Detrembleur, Toby Hall, Philippe Mahaudens, Henri Nielens

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01801553 naterminatednot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Double Blind Study on the Pragmatic Application of a Clinical Prediction Rule in Primary Care to Treat Low Back Pain Patients With a Brief Spinal Manipulation Intervention: a Validation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité Catholique de LouvainRan2013 to 2014Enrolled100ConditionsLow Back PainArmsSpinal manipulation, sham spinal manipulation, Usual medical care
NCT03356886 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Additional Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education to Spinal Manipulative Therapy on Pain And Disability in Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2017 to 2020Enrolled104ConditionsLow Back PainArmsSpinal Manipulative Technique, Pain Neuroscience Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Influence of Stabilization Techniques Used in the Treatment of Low Back Pain on the Level of Kinesiophobia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical Effectiveness and Efficacy of Chiropractic Spinal Manipulation for Spine Pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin HidalgoInstitute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Motor Sciences, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Christine DetrembleurInstitute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Motor Sciences, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Toby HallSchool of Physiotherapy, Curtin Innovation Health Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, WA, Australia.
Philippe MahaudensInstitute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Motor Sciences, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium ; Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Saint-Luc Hospital University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Henri NielensInstitute of Neuroscience, Faculty of Motor Sciences, University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium ; Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine, Saint-Luc Hospital University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
UCLouvain · BECurtin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveto review and update the evidence for different forms of manual therapy (MT) for patients with different stages of non-specific low back pain (LBP). DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Cochrane-Register-of-Controlled-Trials, PEDro, EMBASE.

methodA systematic review of MT with a literature search covering the period of January 2000 to April 2013 was conducted by two independent reviewers according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. A total of 360 studies were evaluated using qualitative criteria. Two stages of LBP were categorized; combined acute-subacute and chronic. Further sub-classification was made according to MT intervention: MT1 (manipulation); MT2 (mobilization and soft-tissue-techniques); and MT3 (MT1 combined with MT2). In each sub-category, MT could be combined or not with exercise or usual medical care (UMC). Consequently, quantitative evaluation criteria were applied to 56 eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and hence 23 low-risk of bias RCTs were identified for review. Only studies providing new updated information (11/23 RCTs) are presented here.

resultsAcute-subacute LBP: STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 when compared to sham for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term (1-3 months). MODERATE-evidence to support MT1 and MT3 combined with UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain, function and health improvements in the short-term. Chronic LBP: MODERATE to STRONG-evidence in favour of MT1 in comparison to sham for pain, function and overall-health in the short-term. MODERATE-evidence in favour of MT3 combined with exercise or UMC in comparison to exercise and back-school was established for pain, function and quality-of-life in the short and long-term. LIMITED-evidence in favour of MT2 combined with exercise and UMC in comparison to UMC alone for pain and function from short to long-term. LIMITED-evidence of no effect for MT1 with extension-exercise compared to extension-exercise alone for pain in the short to long-term.

conclusionThis systematic review updates the evidence for MT with exercise or UMC for different stages of LBP and provides recommendations for future studies.

Indexed as

EfficacyManual therapyNon-specific low back painRandomized controlled trialsSpinal manipulation

Identifiers

PMID24976749
PMCPMC4017797
OpenAlexW2103730282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.