Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24976728›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Laparoscopic vs open extended right hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Li-Ying Zhao, Pan Chi, Wei-Xing Ding, Shun-Rong Huang, Si-Fen Zhang, Kai Pan, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07138859 (Prospective, Multiceter, Randomized, Controlled Study on the Intraoperative Technical Errors of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Radical Right Hemiclectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07138859 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Prospective, Multiceter, Randomized, Controlled Study on the Intraoperative Technical Errors of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Radical Right Hemiclectomy (Superiority Design，ROBOGEON® 2501study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao UniversityRan2025 to 2030Enrolled368ConditionsColorectal Carcinoma (CRC), Right HemicolectomyArmsRobot assisted radical right hemicolectomy (D3 lymph node dissection), Laparoscopic assisted radical right hemicolectomy (D3 lymph node dissection)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. LaparoscopicWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2017
    Article
  16. Laparoscopic resection of right colon cancer-a matched pairs analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in China: an overview.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li-Ying ZhaoLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Pan ChiLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Wei-Xing DingLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Shun-Rong HuangLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Si-Fen ZhangLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Kai PanLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Yan-Feng HuLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Hao LiuLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Guo-Xin LiLi-Ying Zhao, Yan-Feng Hu, Hao Liu, Guo-Xin Li, Department of General Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong Province, China.
Southern Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy (LERH) for colon cancer.

methodsSince its establishment in 2009, the Southern Chinese Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Study (SCLCSS) group has been dedicated to promoting patients' quality of life through minimally invasive surgery. The multicenter database was launched by combining existing datasets from members of the SCLCSS group. The study enrolled 220 consecutive patients who were recorded in the multicenter retrospective database and underwent either LERH (n = 119) or open extended right hemicolectomy (OERH) (n = 101) for colon cancer. Clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups.

resultsThere were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), history of previous abdominal surgery, tumor location, and tumor stage between the two groups. The blood loss was lower in the LERH group than in the OERH group [100 (100-200) mL vs 150 (100-200) mL, P < 0.0001]. The LERH group was associated with earlier first flatus (2.7 ± 1.0 d vs 3.2 ± 0.9 d, P < 0.0001) and resumption of liquid diet (3.6 ± 1.0 d vs 4.2 ± 1.0 d, P < 0.0001) compared to the OERH group. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LERH group (11.4 ± 4.7 d vs 12.8 ± 5.6 d, P = 0.009) than in the OERH group. The complication rate was 11.8% and 17.6% in the LERH and OERH groups, respectively (P = 0.215). Both 3-year overall survival [LERH (92.0%) vs OERH (84.4%), P = 0.209] and 3-year disease-free survival [LERH (84.6%) vs OERH (76.6%), P = 0.191] were comparable between the two groups.

conclusionLERH with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer is a technically feasible and safe procedure, yielding comparable short-term oncologic outcomes to those of open surgery.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChinaColectomyColonic NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLength of StayLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsColon cancerD3 lymphadenectomyExtended right hemicolectomyLaparoscopic surgerySurvival

Identifiers

PMID24976728
PMCPMC4069319
OpenAlexW2093800239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.