ArticleApplied geography (Sevenoaks, England)2014
Participatory Risk Mapping of Malaria Vector Exposure in Northern South America using Environmental and Population Data.
Article in Applied geography (Sevenoaks, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns and Determinants of Imported Malaria near the Argentina-Bolivia Border, 1977-2009.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Participatory mapping identifies risk areas and environmental predictors of endemic anthrax in rural Africa.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Malaria Risk Map Using Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis along Yunnan Border During the Pre-elimination Period.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Mapping and Modelling Malaria Risk Areas Using Climate, Socio-Demographic and Clinical Variables in Chimoio, Mozambique.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Mapping multiple components of malaria risk for improved targeting of elimination interventions.Malaria journal · 2017Review
- Potential distribution of mosquito vector species in a primary malaria endemic region of Colombia.PloS one · 2017Article
- Quantitative assessment of a spatial multicriteria model for highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 in Thailand, and application in Cambodia.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- A multi-criteria decision analysis approach to assessing malaria risk in northern South America.BMC public health · 2016Article
- Prospects and recommendations for risk mapping to improve strategies for effective malaria vector control interventions in Latin America.Malaria journal · 2015Review
- A risk index model for predicting eastern equine encephalitis virus transmission to horses in Florida.Applied geography (Sevenoaks, England) · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Malaria elimination remains a major public health challenge in many tropical regions, including large areas of northern South America. In this study, we present a new high spatial resolution (90 × 90 m) risk map for Colombia and surrounding areas based on environmental and human population data. The map was created through a participatory multi-criteria decision analysis in which expert opinion was solicited to determine key environmental and population risk factors, different fuzzy functions to standardize risk factor inputs, and variable factor weights to combine risk factors in a geographic information system. The new risk map was compared to a map of malaria cases in which cases were aggregated to the municipio (municipality) level. The relationship between mean municipio risk scores and total cases by muncípio showed a weak correlation. However, the relationship between pixel-level risk scores and vector occurrence points for two dominant vector species,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.