Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24976368›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2016

Diagnosing osteomyelitis in the diabetic foot: a pilot study to examine the sensitivity and specificity of Tc(99m) white blood cell-labelled single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography.

Mallory M Przybylski, Samantha Holloway, Steven D Vyce, Antonio Obando

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic imaging of the diabetic foot: an EANM evidence-based guidance.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pathophysiology and Molecular Imaging of Diabetic Foot Infections.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Diabetic Foot Infections: The Diagnostic Challenges.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mallory M PrzybylskiPodiatric Surgery and Medicine, VA Healthcare system/Yale New Haven Hospital, West Haven, CT, USA.
Samantha HollowayInstitute for Translation, Innovation, Methodologies and Engagement, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK.
Steven D VycePodiatric Surgery and Medicine, VA Healthcare system/Yale New Haven Hospital, West Haven, CT, USA.
Antonio ObandoNuclear Medicine, VA Healthcare system/Yale New Haven Hospital, West Haven, CT, USA.
Yale New Haven Hospital · USCardiff University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic foot ulceration poses a significant threat of osteomyelitis (OM) and subsequent amputation. The diagnosis of OM via imaging studies is difficult as radiographic findings do not present immediately and advanced imaging studies may be contraindicated or unavailable. A novel diagnostic tool has been developed which synthesises technetium-99 white blood cell-labelled single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography (Tc(99m) WBC labelled-SPECT/CT) imaging, effectively enhancing anatomic detail. The aim of this pilot study was to determine the validity and reliability of this novel imaging technique in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a Veterans Affairs healthcare facility. A retrospective review was performed on consecutive patients who met the inclusion criteria (n = 14) and underwent Tc(99m) WBC-labelled SPECT/CT for suspected OM. Histopathologic analysis of bone specimen (when available) and International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot consensus criteria were used as a reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity of Tc(99m) WBC-labelled SPECT/CT were 87·50% [confidence interval (CI): 64·58-110·42%] and 71·43% (CI: 37·96-104·90%), respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) were 83·33% (CI: 53·51-113·15%) and 77·78% (CI: 50·62-104·94%), respectively, with a likelihood ratio (LR) of 3·063 and an accuracy of 80%. These findings suggest Tc(99m) WBC-labelled SPECT/CT can be useful in imaging OM in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

Indexed as

OsteomyelitisDiabetic FootHumansLeukocytesPilot ProjectsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonTomography, X-Ray ComputedBone scanDiabetic foot ulcerImagingOsteomyelitisSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID24976368
PMCPMC7949640
OpenAlexW1922079693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.