ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology2014
Endoscopic submucosal dissection: experience in an Australian tertiary center.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Single-Center Early Experience of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastric Lesions in Thailand.Gastroenterology research and practice · 2020Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastric tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2016Article
- How to establish endoscopic submucosal dissection in Western countries.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Deep colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection using a modified clip and snare method incorporating a pre-looping technique.BMJ case reports · 2015Article
- Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Gastrointestinal Superficial Lesions: Initial Experience in a Single Portuguese Center.GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a technique for
methodsThe patient features, outcomes and complications of ESD of 20 lesions in 18 patients at a single center between 2008 and 2012, were evaluated retrospectively.
resultsTwenty lesions, in 18 patients of median age 69.5 years, were resected with ESD. Ten patients had gastric lesions (of whom two had two synchronous lesions), four patients had rectal lesions, one had a colonic lesion, one had a duodenal lesion and two had esophageal lesions. The median (range) lesion size was 2.5 (0.5-6.5) cm. In the entire cohort,
conclusionsESD appears feasible in an Australian population. It should however be contemplated in carefully selected patients whilst there is refinement of pre-treatment diagnosis, the ESD technique and the management of its complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24976337PMC4073016W1832610434What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.