Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24975596›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2014

A prospective, randomized study on hepatotoxicity of anastrozole compared with tamoxifen in women with breast cancer.

Ying Lin, Jianlun Liu, Xiaohua Zhang, Li Li, Rui Hu, Jian Liu, Yongchuan Deng, Dedian Chen, Yangbing Zhao, Shengrong Sun and 20 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. High-content imaging assays on a miniaturized 3D cell culture platform.Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Ying LinDepartment of Surgery, Breast Disease Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jianlun Liu
Xiaohua Zhang
Li Li
Rui Hu
Jian Liu
Yongchuan Deng
Dedian Chen
Yangbing Zhao
Shengrong Sun
Rong Ma
Ying Zhao
Jinping Liu
Yang Zhang
Xijing Wang
Yafen Li
Pingqing He
Enxiao Li
Zheli Xu
Yaqun Wu
Zhongsheng Tong
Xiaojia Wang
Tao Huang
Zhongxiao Liang
Shui Wang
Fengxi Su
Yunfei Lu
Helong Zhang
Guosheng Feng
Shenming Wang
Sun Yat-sen University · CNFourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CNDalian Medical University · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNShanxi Medical University · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNZhejiang Cancer Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CNGuangxi Medical University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CNRuijin Hospital · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University · CNShanghai Sixth People's Hospital · CNSichuan Cancer Hospital · CNTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · CNUnion Hospital · CNWenzhou Medical University · CNWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tamoxifen and anastrozole are widely used as adjuvant treatment for early stage breast cancer, but their hepatotoxicity is not fully defined. We aimed to compare hepatotoxicity of anastrozole with tamoxifen in the adjuvant setting in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Three hundred and fifty-three Chinese postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer were randomized to anastrozole or tamoxifen after optimal primary therapy. The primary end-point was fatty liver disease, defined as a liver-spleen ratio <0.9 as determined using a computed tomography scan. The secondary end-points included abnormal liver function and treatment failure during the 3-year follow up. The cumulative incidence of fatty liver disease after 3 years was lower in the anastrozole arm than that of tamoxifen (14.6% vs 41.1%, P < 0.0001; relative risk, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21-0.45). However, there was no difference in the cumulative incidence of abnormal liver function (24.6% vs 24.7%, P = 0.61). Interestingly, a higher treatment failure rate was observed in the tamoxifen arm compared with anastrozole and median times to treatment failure were 15.1 months and 37.1 months, respectively (P < 0.0001; HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.20-0.37). The most commonly reported adverse events were 'reproductive system disorders' in the tamoxifen group (17.1%), and 'musculoskeletal disorders' in the anastrozole group (14.6%). Postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer receiving adjuvant anastrozole displayed less fatty liver disease, suggesting that this drug had a more favorable hepatic safety profile than tamoxifen and may be preferred for patients with potential hepatic dysfunction.

Indexed as

AgedAnastrozoleBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastChemotherapy, AdjuvantFatty LiverFemaleHumansLiverMiddle AgedNitrilesProspective StudiesTamoxifenTreatment FailureTriazolesAnastrozoleNitrilesTamoxifenTriazolesAnastrozolebreast cancerclinical trialfatty liver diseasehepatotoxicitytamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID24975596
PMCPMC4462391
OpenAlexW1978290938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.