ArticleJournal of anatomy2014
Beyond the functional matrix hypothesis: a network null model of human skull growth for the formation of bone articulations.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early life functional transitions impact craniofacial morphology in osteogenesis imperfecta.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2025Article
- Neuroimaging in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis: Key Concepts to Unlock Innovation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Elastodontic Appliances for the Interception of Malocclusion in Children: A Systematic Narrative Hybrid Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A comprehensive anatomical network analysis of human brain topology.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Anatomical comparison across heads, fore- and hindlimbs in mammals using network models.Journal of anatomy · 2021Article
- A retrospective computed tomography analysis of maxillary fractures and the clinical outcomes of their unreduced parts.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2019Article
- Craniofacial skeletal response to encephalization: How do we know what we think we know?American journal of physical anthropology · 2019Article
- Developmental pathways inferred from modularity, morphological integration and fluctuating asymmetry patterns in the human face.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Structure, function, and control of the human musculoskeletal network.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Bone Fusion in Normal and Pathological Development is Constrained by the Network Architecture of the Human Skull.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Anatomical networks reveal the musculoskeletal modularity of the human head.Scientific reports · 2015Article
- Orbital Fractures in Childhood.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
- Machine Learning in Metopic Craniosynostosis: Does Phenotypic Severity Predict Long-Term Esthetic Outcome?The Journal of craniofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Craniofacial sutures and synchondroses form the boundaries among bones in the human skull, providing functional, developmental and evolutionary information. Bone articulations in the skull arise due to interactions between genetic regulatory mechanisms and epigenetic factors such as functional matrices (soft tissues and cranial cavities), which mediate bone growth. These matrices are largely acknowledged for their influence on shaping the bones of the skull; however, it is not fully understood to what extent functional matrices mediate the formation of bone articulations. Aiming to identify whether or not functional matrices are key developmental factors guiding the formation of bone articulations, we have built a network null model of the skull that simulates unconstrained bone growth. This null model predicts bone articulations that arise due to a process of bone growth that is uniform in rate, direction and timing. By comparing predicted articulations with the actual bone articulations of the human skull, we have identified which boundaries specifically need the presence of functional matrices for their formation. We show that functional matrices are necessary to connect facial bones, whereas an unconstrained bone growth is sufficient to connect non-facial bones. This finding challenges the role of the brain in the formation of boundaries between bones in the braincase without neglecting its effect on skull shape. Ultimately, our null model suggests where to look for modified developmental mechanisms promoting changes in bone growth patterns that could affect the development and evolution of the head skeleton.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.