Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24975116›Full record

Trial reportAIDS care2014

Simple, illustrated medicines information improves ARV knowledge and patient self-efficacy in limited literacy South African HIV patients.

R Dowse, K Barford, S H Browne

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in AIDS care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Challenges and Enablers of Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence Among Ethiopian Adolescents: A Qualitative Study.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R Dowsea Faculty of Pharmacy , Rhodes University , Grahamstown , South Africa.
K Barford
S H Browne

Funding

VirologyP30AI036214 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI David Mitchell Smith · 1994 to 2026
$78.4M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI036214NIAID NIH HHS P30AI036214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Few studies have investigated antiretroviral (ARV) knowledge and self-efficacy in limited literacy patients. Using a randomized controlled study design, we investigated the influence of a simple pre-tested patient information leaflet (PIL) containing both text and illustrations on HIV- and ARV-related knowledge and on self-efficacy over six months in a limited literacy African population. The recruited patients were randomly allocated to either control (standard care) or intervention group (standard care plus illustrated PIL). HIV and medicines-related knowledge was evaluated with a 22-question test at baseline, one, three, and six months. Self-efficacy was assessed using a modified version of the HIV Treatment Adherence Self-Efficacy Scale. Two-thirds of the patients were female, mean age was 39.0 ± 9.6 years and mean education was 7.3 ± 2.8 years. Patients who received the PIL showed a significant knowledge increase over the six-month period (62.0-94.4%), with improvement at each subsequent interview whereas the control group showed no improvement. At baseline, side effect knowledge was the lowest (50-56%) but increased in the intervention group to 92%. Similarly, other medicine-related knowledge at baseline (57-67%) improved significantly (93%) and was sustained over six months. Cohen's d values post-baseline ranged between 1.36 and 2.18, indicating a large intervention effect. Self-efficacy improved significantly over six months in intervention but not control patients. At baseline, patients with ≤ 3 years of education had lower knowledge and self-efficacy but this was not observed post-intervention, which we attribute to the PIL mitigating the effect of limited education. Knowledge and self-efficacy were significantly correlated in the intervention group. In conclusion, a low-cost intervention of a well-designed, pre-tested, simple, illustrated PIL significantly increased both ARV knowledge and self-efficacy in HIV patients with limited education.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAnti-Retroviral AgentsBlack PeopleFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMalePamphletsPatient Education as TopicRural PopulationSelf EfficacySocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaAnti-Retroviral Agentsknowledgelow literacypictogramsself-efficacywritten patient information

Identifiers

PMID24975116
PMCPMC4124945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.