Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24974958›Full record

ArticleArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)2014

Use of a validated algorithm to judge the appropriateness of total knee arthroplasty in the United States: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study.

Daniel L Riddle, William A Jiranek, Curtis W Hayes

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05105646 (Are Preoperative Perception of Pain and Psychological Distress Before Primary Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Reason for Revision Surgery? Results of an Observational Study From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.), which is not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05105646 completednot on this map

Are Preoperative Perception of Pain and Psychological Distress Before Primary Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Reason for Revision Surgery? Results of an Observational Study From the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

TypeobservationalSponsorLeiden University Medical CenterRan2014 to 2019Enrolled70,754ConditionsOsteo Arthritis Knee, Psychological DistressArmsKnee Arthroplasty, knee revision arthoplasty
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Prevalence of Appropriate Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in a Large Multicenter US Cohort Using a RAND/UCLA Algorithm.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel L RiddleVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
William A Jiranek
Curtis W Hayes

Funding

DATA COORDINATING CENTER FOR THE OSTEOARTHRITIS INITIATIVE-264022258N01AR022258 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SYS OFFICE/PRES · 2003 to 2003
–
NHLBI NIH HHS N01 AR022258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn previous studies conducted outside the US, ∼20% of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgeries were judged to be inappropriate. The present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence rates of TKA surgeries classified as appropriate, inconclusive, and inappropriate in a knee osteoarthritis population in the US.

methodsWe used a modification of a validated appropriateness classification system and applied it to patients in the Osteoarthritis Initiative data set who underwent TKA. A variety of preoperative data were used in the classification, including Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain and physical function scores, radiographic features, knee motion and laxity measures, and age.

resultsData on 205 patients who underwent TKA were examined. The prevalence rates for classification of the procedure as appropriate, inconclusive, and inappropriate were 44.0% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 37-51%), 21.7% (95% CI 16-28%), and 34.3% (95% CI 27-41%), respectively.

conclusionApproximately one-third of TKA surgeries were judged to be inappropriate. Variation in the characteristics of patients undergoing TKA was extensive. These data support the need for consensus development of criteria for patient selection among US practitioners treating patients who are potential candidates for TKA. Among the important issues, consensus development needs to address variation in patient characteristics and the relative importance of preoperative status and subsequent outcome.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPatient SelectionAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeChildCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsUnited StatesUnnecessary Procedures

Identifiers

PMID24974958
PMCPMC4190177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.