Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24974895›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2014

A genome-scale metabolic flux model of Escherichia coli K-12 derived from the EcoCyc database.

Daniel S Weaver, Ingrid M Keseler, Amanda Mackie, Ian T Paulsen, Peter D Karp

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The EcoCyc database (2025).EcoSal Plus · 2025
    Review
  4. Reconstruction of the genome-scale metabolic network model ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The EcoCyc Database (2023).EcoSal Plus · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Generation and analysis of context-specific genome-scale metabolic models derived from single-cell RNA-Seq data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Simultaneous cross-evaluation of heterogeneousScience (New York, N.Y.) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Network reduction methods for genome-scale metabolic models.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel S WeaverBioinformatics Research Group, SRI International, 333 Ravenswood Ave,, 94025 Menlo Park, CA, USA. weaver@ai.sri.com.
Ingrid M Keseler
Amanda Mackie
Ian T Paulsen
Peter D Karp
SRI International · USMacquarie University · AU

Funding

The EcoCyc Model Organism Database for Escherichia coli [SRI Proposal ECU 14-631]U24GM077678 · NIGMS · SRI INTERNATIONAL · PI KARP, PETER D · 2006 to 2018
$12.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS U24 GM077678NIGMS NIH HHS U24GM077678
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConstraint-based models of Escherichia coli metabolic flux have played a key role in computational studies of cellular metabolism at the genome scale. We sought to develop a next-generation constraint-based E. coli model that achieved improved phenotypic prediction accuracy while being frequently updated and easy to use. We also sought to compare model predictions with experimental data to highlight open questions in E. coli biology.

resultsWe present EcoCyc-18.0-GEM, a genome-scale model of the E. coli K-12 MG1655 metabolic network. The model is automatically generated from the current state of EcoCyc using the MetaFlux software, enabling the release of multiple model updates per year. EcoCyc-18.0-GEM encompasses 1445 genes, 2286 unique metabolic reactions, and 1453 unique metabolites. We demonstrate a three-part validation of the model that breaks new ground in breadth and accuracy: (i) Comparison of simulated growth in aerobic and anaerobic glucose culture with experimental results from chemostat culture and simulation results from the E. coli modeling literature. (ii) Essentiality prediction for the 1445 genes represented in the model, in which EcoCyc-18.0-GEM achieves an improved accuracy of 95.2% in predicting the growth phenotype of experimental gene knockouts. (iii) Nutrient utilization predictions under 431 different media conditions, for which the model achieves an overall accuracy of 80.7%. The model's derivation from EcoCyc enables query and visualization via the EcoCyc website, facilitating model reuse and validation by inspection. We present an extensive investigation of disagreements between EcoCyc-18.0-GEM predictions and experimental data to highlight areas of interest to E. coli modelers and experimentalists, including 70 incorrect predictions of gene essentiality on glucose, 80 incorrect predictions of gene essentiality on glycerol, and 83 incorrect predictions of nutrient utilization.

conclusionSignificant advantages can be derived from the combination of model organism databases and flux balance modeling represented by MetaFlux. Interpretation of the EcoCyc database as a flux balance model results in a highly accurate metabolic model and provides a rigorous consistency check for information stored in the database.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualGenomicsMetabolic Flux AnalysisModels, BiologicalAdenosine TriphosphateBiomassEscherichia coli K12Genome, BacterialSoftwareAdenosine Triphosphate

Identifiers

PMID24974895
PMCPMC4086706
OpenAlexW2162115836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.