Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24974832›Full record

ReviewMedical education online2014

Where do we go from here? Moving from systems-based practice process measures to true competency via developmental milestones.

Johanna Martinez, Erica Phillips, Christina Harris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical education online, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Lessons from COVID-19 for future disasters: an opinion paper.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Expanding the genetic counseling workforce: program directors' views on increasing the size of genetic counseling graduate programs.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johanna MartinezDepartment of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA; Jom9050@med.cornell.edu.
Erica PhillipsDepartment of Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
Christina HarrisDavid Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Trial Using Motivational Interviewing Positive Affect and Self-Affirmation in HyP60MD003421 · NIMHD · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI OGEDEGBE, OLUGBENGA G. · 2009 to 2013
$8.9M
NIMHD NIH HHS 1P60MD003421NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD003421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For many educators it has been challenging to meet the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's requirements for teaching systems-based practice (SBP). An additional layer of complexity for educators is evaluating competency in SBP, despite milestones and entrustable professional activities (EPAs). In order to address this challenge, the authors present the results of a literature review for how SBP is currently being taught and a series of recommendations on how to achieve competency in SBP for graduate medical trainees with the use of milestones. The literature review included 29 articles and demonstrated that only 28% of the articles taught more than one of the six core principles of SBP in a meaningful way. Only 7% of the articles received the highest grade of A. The authors summarize four guiding principles for creating a competency-based curriculum that is in alignment with the Next Accreditation System (NAS): 1) the curriculum needs to include all of the core principles in that competency, 2) the objectives of the curriculum should be driven by clinical outcomes, 3) the teaching modalities need to be interactive and clinically relevant, and 4) the evaluation process should be able to measure competency and be directly reflective of pertinent milestones and/or EPAs. This literature review and the provided guiding principles can guide other residency educators in their development of competency-based curricula that meets the standards of the NAS.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAccreditationCompetency-Based EducationCurriculumEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateHumansTeachingcore competenciesdevelopmental milestonessystems-based practice

Identifiers

PMID24974832
PMCPMC4074604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.