Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24974818›Full record

ArticleProteomics. Clinical applications2014

Identification of cardiac myofilament protein isoforms using multiple mass spectrometry based approaches.

Viola Kooij, Vidya Venkatraman, Jonathan A Kirk, Ceereena Ubaida-Mohien, David R Graham, Matthijs J Faber, Jennifer E Van Eyk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomics. Clinical applications, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Proteomics of the heart.Physiological reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Viola Kooij *Department of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Vidya Venkatraman *Department of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Jonathan A KirkDepartment of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Ceereena Ubaida-MohienDepartment of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
David R GrahamDepartment of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Matthijs J FaberErasmus MC-Sophia, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jennifer E Van EykDepartment of medicine, Division of Cardiology, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

Pathobiology of Cardiac Dyssynchrony &ResynchronizationP01HL077180 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KASS, DAVID ALAN · 2004 to 2014
$22.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000032CNHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL077180NHLBI NIH HHS P01-HL077180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe identification of protein isoforms in complex biological samples is challenging. We, therefore, used an MS approach to unambiguously identify cardiac myofilament protein isoforms based on the observation of a tryptic peptide consisting of a sequence unique to a particular isoform. EXPERIMENTAL

designThree different workflows were used to isolate and fractionate rat cardiac myofilament subproteomes. All fractions were analyzed on an LTQ-Orbitrap MS, proteins were identified using various search engines (MASCOT, X!Tandem, X!Tandem Kscore, and OMSSA) with results combined via PepArML Meta-Search engine, and a postsearch analysis was performed by MASPECTRAS. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000874 (http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD000874).

resultsThe combination of multiple workflows and search engines resulted in a larger number of nonredundant proteins identified than with individual methods. A total of 102 myofilament annotated proteins were observed overlapping in two or three of the workflows. Literature search for myofilament presence with manual validation of the MS spectra was carried out for unambiguous identification: ten cardiac myofilament and 17 cardiac myofilament-associated proteins were identified with 39 isoforms and subisoforms. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: We have identified multiple isoforms of myofilament proteins that are present in cardiac tissue using unique tryptic peptides. Changes in distribution of these protein isoforms under pathological conditions could ultimately allow for clinical diagnostics or as therapeutic targets.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryAmino Acid SequenceAnimalsMolecular Sequence DataMyofibrilsProtein IsoformsProteomicsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTrypsinProtein IsoformsTrypsinCardiacMyofilament proteinsProtein isoformsProtein subisoforms

Identifiers

PMID24974818
PMCPMC4222538
OpenAlexW2070094007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.