ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014
The coevolutionary period of Wolbachia pipientis infecting Drosophila ananassae and its impact on the evolution of the host germline stem cell regulating genes.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative Analysis of Drosophila Bam and Bgcn Sequences and Predicted Protein Structural Evolution.Journal of molecular evolution · 2025Article
- Complete de novo assembly of Wolbachia endosymbiont of Drosophila willistoni using long-read genome sequencing.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Evolution under a model of functionally buffered deleterious mutations can lead to positive selection in protein-coding genes.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2023Article
- Low Endosymbiont Incidence in Drosophila Species Across Peninsula Thailand.Microbial ecology · 2023Article
- Functional Divergence of the bag-of-marbles Gene in the Drosophila melanogaster Species Group.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Stonewall prevents expression of ectopic genes in the ovary and accumulates at insulator elements in D. melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Rapid Divergence of Key Spermatogenesis Genes in nasuta-Subgroup of Drosophila.Journal of molecular evolution · 2022Article
- Diverse wMel variants of Wolbachia pipientis differentially rescue fertility and cytological defects of the bag of marbles partial loss of function mutation in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Molecular population genetics of Sex-lethal (Sxl) in the Drosophila melanogaster species group: a locus that genetically interacts with Wolbachia pipientis in Drosophila melanogaster.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- Contrasting patterns of molecular evolution in metazoan germ line genes.BMC evolutionary biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Population genomics of Wolbachia and mtDNA in Drosophila simulans from California.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Retrotransposons Are the Major Contributors to the Expansion of theG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2017Article
- Recent and Long-Term Selection Across Synonymous Sites in Drosophila ananassae.Journal of molecular evolution · 2016Article
- Status of research on Drosophila ananassae at global level.Journal of genetics · 2015Review
- Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Germline Stem Cell and Neural Stem Cell Regulating Genes.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- Population Genomics of Infectious and Integrated Wolbachia pipientis Genomes in Drosophila ananassae.Genome biology and evolution · 2015Article
- The Drosophila bag of marbles Gene Interacts Genetically with Wolbachia and Shows Female-Specific Effects of Divergence.PLoS genetics · 2015Article
- Extensive duplication of the Wolbachia DNA in chromosome four of Drosophila ananassae.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Extreme divergence of Wolbachia tropism for the stem-cell-niche in the Drosophila testis.PLoS pathogens · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia pipientis is known to infect a wide range of arthropod species yet less is known about the coevolutionary history it has with its hosts. Evidence of highly identical W. pipientis strains in evolutionary divergent hosts suggests horizontal transfer between hosts. For example, Drosophila ananassae is infected with a W. pipientis strain that is nearly identical in sequence to a strain that infects both D. simulans and D. suzukii, suggesting recent horizontal transfer among these three species. However, it is unknown whether the W. pipientis strain had recently invaded all three species or a more complex infectious dynamic underlies the horizontal transfers. Here, we have examined the coevolutionary history of D. ananassae and its resident W. pipientis to infer its period of infection. Phylogenetic analysis of D. ananassae mitochondrial DNA and W. pipientis DNA sequence diversity revealed the current W. pipientis infection is not recent. In addition, we examined the population genetics and molecular evolution of several germline stem cell (GSC) regulating genes of D. ananassae. These studies reveal significant evidence of recent and long-term positive selection at stonewall in D. ananassae, whereas pumillio showed patterns of variation consistent with only recent positive selection. Previous studies had found evidence for adaptive evolution of two key germline differentiation genes, bag of marbles (bam) and benign gonial cell neoplasm (bgcn), in D. melanogaster and D. simulans and proposed that the adaptive evolution at these two genes was driven by arms race between the host GSC and W. pipientis. However, we did not find any statistical departures from a neutral model of evolution for bam and bgcn in D. ananassae despite our new evidence that this species has been infected with W. pipientis for a period longer than the most recent infection in D. melanogaster. In the end, analyzing the GSC regulating genes individually showed two of the seven genes to have evidence of selection. However, combining the data set and fitting a specific population genetic model significant proportion of the nonsynonymous sites across the GSC regulating genes were driven to fixation by positive selection. Clearly the GSC system is under rapid evolution and potentially multiple drivers are causing the rapid evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.