Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24974376›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2014

Prospects for building large timetrees using molecular data with incomplete gene coverage among species.

Alan Filipski, Oscar Murillo, Anna Freydenzon, Koichiro Tamura, Sudhir Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comprehensive Comparative Analysis of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Identification of a dCache-type chemoreceptor inFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A matter of background: DNA repair pathways as a possible cause for the sparse distribution of CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Genomic and Proteomic Characterizations ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan FilipskiCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University.
Oscar MurilloCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University.
Anna FreydenzonCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University.
Koichiro TamuraDepartment of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, JapanResearch Center for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Tokyo, Japan.
Sudhir KumarCenter for Evolutionary Medicine and Informatics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State UniversitySchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State UniversityCenter of Excellence in Genomic Medicine Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi ArabiaInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple UniversityDepartment of Biology, Temple University s.kumar@temple.edu.

Funding

COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANALYSISR01HG002096 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2000 to 2013
$3.0M
Graduate and Undergraduate Training in Biomedicine at ASUR25GM099650 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI NEWFELD, STUART J · 2012 to 2015
$2.2M
A phylogenetic approach to metagenomic analysisR21HG006039 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI FILIPSKI, ALAN · 2011 to 2012
$419k
NHGRI NIH HHS HG002096-12NHGRI NIH HHS HG006039-02NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002096NHGRI NIH HHS R21 HG006039NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM099650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientists are assembling sequence data sets from increasing numbers of species and genes to build comprehensive timetrees. However, data are often unavailable for some species and gene combinations, and the proportion of missing data is often large for data sets containing many genes and species. Surprisingly, there has not been a systematic analysis of the effect of the degree of sparseness of the species-gene matrix on the accuracy of divergence time estimates. Here, we present results from computer simulations and empirical data analyses to quantify the impact of missing gene data on divergence time estimation in large phylogenies. We found that estimates of divergence times were robust even when sequences from a majority of genes for most of the species were absent. From the analysis of such extremely sparse data sets, we found that the most egregious errors occurred for nodes in the tree that had no common genes for any pair of species in the immediate descendant clades of the node in question. These problematic nodes can be easily detected prior to computational analyses based only on the input sequence alignment and the tree topology. We conclude that it is best to use larger alignments, because adding both genes and species to the alignment augments the number of genes available for estimating divergence events deep in the tree and improves their time estimates.

Indexed as

GenesPhylogenyComputer SimulationEvolution, MolecularModels, GeneticSequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNAdivergence timeincomplete datatimetree

Identifiers

PMID24974376
PMCPMC4137717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.