ArticleBMC family practice2014
Perceptions of quality in primary health care: perspectives of patients and professionals based on focus group discussions.
Article in BMC family practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The renewed Development Model for Integrated Care: a systematic review and model update.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.Archives of osteoporosis · 2024Pooled it
- Patients values regarding primary health care: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative evidence.BMC health services research · 2023Pooled it
- Developing a new clinical governance framework for chronic diseases in primary care: an umbrella review.BMJ open · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Comprehensiveness in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.The Milbank quarterly · 2025Article
- Differences in the referral process from general practice to resident specialists in gynaecology depending on density of specialists and patients' socioeconomic status.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Article
- Seeking lifestyle counselling at primary health care centres: a cross-sectional study in the Swedish population.BMC primary care · 2023Article
- Danish general practitioners as gatekeepers for gynaecological patients in regions with different density of resident specialists in gynaecology: in which situations and to whom do they refer? A cross-sectional study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Article
- Differences in Perception of Healthcare Management between Patients and Professionals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Impacts of Internet Use on Chinese Patients' Trust-Related Primary Healthcare Utilization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Primary Health Institutions and Service Quality in China: Implications for Health Policy.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Inequality in households' access to primary health care (PHC): a case study in Kerman, southeast Iran.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Patient perspectives on the management of COPD and Type 2 Diabetes in general practice: an interview study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- The perception of health care quality by primary health care managers in Ukraine.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Article
- Causal explanations for patient engagement with primary care services in Saudi Arabia: a realist review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Quality Perceptions and Choice of Public Health Facilities: A Mediation Effect Analysis of Outpatient Experience in Rural China.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Article
- Quality of care and patient safety at healthcare institutions in Oman: quantitative study of the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Quality assessment of services provided by health centers in Mashhad, Iran: SERVQUAL versus HEALTHQUAL scales.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe EUprimecare project-team assessed the perception of primary health care (PHC) professionals and patients on quality of organization of PHC systems in the participating countries: Estonia, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania and Spain. This article presents the aggregated opinions, expectations and priorities of patients and professionals along some main dimensions of quality in primary health care, such as access, equity, appropriateness and patient- centeredness.
methodsThe focus group technique was applied in the study as a qualitative research method for exploration of attitudes regarding the health care system and health service. Discussions were addressing the topics of: general aspects of quality in primary health care; possibilities to receive/provide PHC services based on both parties needs; determinant factors of accessibility to PHC services; patient centeredness. The data sets collected during the focus group discussions were evaluated using the method of thematic analysis.
resultsThere were 14 focus groups in total: a professional and a patient group in each of the seven partner countries. Findings of the thematic analysis were summarized along the following dimensions: access and equity, appropriateness (coordination, continuity, competency and comprehensiveness) and patient centeredness.
conclusionsThis study shows perceptions and views of patients in interaction with PHC and opinion of professionals working in PHC. It serves as source of criteria with relevance to everyday practice and experience. The criteria mentioned by patients and by health care professionals which were considered determining factors of the quality in primary care were quite similar among the investigated countries. However, the perception and the level of tolerance regarding some of the criteria differed among EUprimecare countries. Among these dissimilar criteria we especially note the gate-keeping role of GPs, the importance of nurses' competency and the acceptance of waiting times. The impact of waiting time on patient satisfaction is obvious; the influence of equity and access to PHC services are more dependent on the equal distribution of settings and doctors in urban and rural area. Foreseen shortage of doctors is expected to have a substantial influence on patient satisfaction in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.