Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24973895›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2015

mGluR5 positive allosteric modulation and its effects on MK-801 induced set-shifting impairments in a rat operant delayed matching/non-matching-to-sample task.

Amber L LaCrosse, Brian T Burrows, Rachel M Angulo, Phoebe R Conrad, Sarah M Himes, Nordia Mathews, Scott A Wegner, Sara B Taylor, M Foster Olive

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. mGluACS pharmacology & translational science · 2019
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: an Update.Current treatment options in psychiatry
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amber L LaCrosseDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA, alacross@asu.edu.
Brian T Burrows
Rachel M Angulo
Phoebe R Conrad
Sarah M Himes
Nordia Mathews
Scott A Wegner
Sara B Taylor
M Foster Olive
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Signaling and Extinction LearningR01DA024355 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI OLIVE, M. FOSTER · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS DA024355NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePositive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR5) exert pro-cognitive effects in animal models of various neuropsychiatric diseases. However, few studies to date have examined ability of mGluR5 PAMs to reverse cognitive deficits in operant delayed matching/non-matching-to-sample (DMS/DNMS) tasks.

objectivesThis study aims to determine the ability of the mGluR5 PAM 3-cyano-N-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)benzamide (CDPPB) to reverse set-shifting deficits induced by the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist MK-801.

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were initially trained to lever press for sucrose reinforcement under either DMS or DNMS conditions. Following successful acquisition of the task, reinforcement conditions were reversed (DNMS → DMS or DMS → DNMS). In Experiment 1, rats were treated daily prior to each session with vehicle/vehicle, vehicle/MK-801 (0.06 mg/kg) simultaneously, CDPPB (20 mg/kg)/MK-801 simultaneously, or CDPPB 30 min prior to MK-801. In Experiment 2, rats were treated with either vehicle/vehicle, vehicle/MK-801, or CDPPB 30 min prior to MK-801 only prior to sessions that followed task reversal.

resultsIn Experiment 1, no group differences in initial task acquisition were observed. Rats treated with vehicle/MK-801 showed significant set-shifting impairments following task reversal, which were partially attenuated by simultaneous administration of CDPPB/MK-801 and completely precluded by administration of CDPPB 30 min prior to MK-801. In Experiment 2, MK-801 did not impair reversal learning, and no other group differences were observed.

conclusionsMK-801-induced deficits in operant set-shifting ability were prevented by pretreatment with CDPPB. MK-801 did not produce deficits in task learning when treatment was initiated following task reversal.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAnimalsBenzamidesConditioning, OperantDizocilpine MaleateLearningMalePyrazolesRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 53-cyano-N-(1,3-diphenyl-1H-pyrazol-5-yl)benzamideBenzamidesDizocilpine MaleatePyrazolesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5

Identifiers

PMID24973895
PMCPMC4278949
OpenAlexW2103433890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.