Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24973889›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2014

Histopathological characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast according to HER2 amplification status and molecular subtype.

Mieke Van Bockstal, Kathleen Lambein, Hannelore Denys, Geert Braems, Ann Nuyts, Rudy Van den Broecke, Veronique Cocquyt, Olivier De Wever, Louis Libbrecht

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Chaos and Consequence.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Sclerosing adenosis as a predictor of breast cancer bilaterality and multicentricity.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2015
    Article
  17. Large palpable ductal carcinoma in situ is Her-2 positive with high nuclear grade.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mieke Van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium, Mieke.VanBockstal@UGent.be.
Kathleen Lambein
Hannelore Denys
Geert Braems
Ann Nuyts
Rudy Van den Broecke
Veronique Cocquyt
Olivier De Wever
Louis Libbrecht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) according to human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification status and molecular subtype. In addition, we performed a detailed HER2 and CEP17 copy number analysis and we assessed the impact of recent changes in the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines on HER2 immunohistochemical (IHC) scores in DCIS. Nuclear grade, extensive comedonecrosis, stromal architecture, stromal inflammation, and progesterone receptor (PR) expression were significantly associated with HER2 amplification status. In multivariate analysis, stromal inflammation and extensive comedonecrosis were the only two features that remained significantly related to HER2 amplification status. The recent changes in ASCO/CAP guidelines resulted in significant upgrading of HER2 IHC score. Remarkably, about one in five non-amplified DCIS presented a 3+ IHC score, regardless of the scoring method. The biological significance of this phenomenon is presently unknown. After categorization according to molecular subtype, luminal A DCIS mainly presented histopathological features associated with good prognosis, whereas luminal B/HER2+ and HER2+ categories displayed a more aggressive phenotype. Overall, our results demonstrate that HER2-amplified DCIS constitute a clearly distinct subgroup which is characterized by histopathological features associated with poor prognosis. Further studies are required to elucidate the biological significance of a 3+ IHC score in non-amplified DCIS, as well as its mechanism.

Indexed as

Gene AmplificationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene DosageHumansImmunohistochemistryIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.