SynthesisMolecular biology reports2014
A meta-analysis of genotypes and haplotypes of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene polymorphisms in breast cancer.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strong Correlation of MTHFR Gene Polymorphisms with Breast Cancer and its Prognostic Clinical Factors among Egyptian Females.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- MTHFR, XRCC1 and OGG1 genetic polymorphisms in breast cancer: a case-control study in a population from North Sardinia.BMC cancer · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- A variety of gene polymorphisms associated with idiopathic granulomatous mastitis.Journal of surgical case reports · 2016Article
- Association of Methylenetetrahydrafolate Reductase Gene Polymorphism (MTHFR) in Patients with Gallbladder Cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2016Article
- MTHFR Gene Polymorphism-Mutations and Air Pollution as Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Metaprediction Study.Nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and breast cancer risk has been extensively explored, but their results are conflicting rather than conclusive. To derive a more precise estimation, we carried out not only an updated meta-analysis but also a combined analysis based on all the available studies estimating the association between MTHFR C677T and/or A1298C and breast cancer risk. With respect to C677T polymorphism, the results suggested that 677T allele was associated with significantly elevated breast cancer risk in overall analysis (T vs. C: OR 1.073, 95 % CI 1.028-1.120; TT vs. CC: OR 1.177, 95 % CI 1.072-1.293; TT vs. CC + CT: OR 1.175, 95 % CI 1.073-1.288); Stratifying by ethnicity, significantly increased risk was only found in East Asians (T vs. C: OR 1.150, 95 % CI 1.039-1.273; TT vs. CC: OR 1.441, 95 % CI 1.145-1.814; TT vs. CC + CT: OR 1.413, 95 % CI 1.148-1.739); When stratified by menopausal status, statistically significant association was found for postmenopausal women (CT + TT vs. CC: OR 1.092, 95 % CI 1.011-1.179). In regard to A1298C polymorphism, no significant associations were found between the polymorphism and breast cancer risk. With respect to MTHFR haplotypes, significantly elevated breast cancer risk was associated with 677T-1298C for overall result (OR 1.498, 95 % CI 1.143-1.962) and for Caucasians (OR 2.088, 95 % CI 1.277-3.416) when compared with 677C-1298A; Haplotype 677C-1298C might provide higher protection than 677C-1298A in East Asians (OR 0.840, 95 % CI 0.742-0.949). The combined genotypes for C677T and A1298C produced a significant OR for the 677TT/1298AC relative to 677CC/1298AA in overall population (OR 2.047, 95 % CI 1.275-3.288); When stratified by ethnicity, significant ORs were only found for East Asians (677CC/1298CC vs. 677CC/1298AA: OR 0.686, 95 % CI 0.478-0.985; 677TT/1298AC vs. 677CC/1298AA: OR 2.181, 95 % CI 1.179-4.035). The findings suggest that the MTHFR C677T polymorphism but not A1298C, and some variants on their combined genotypes or haplotypes may be involved with the development of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.