Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24973741›Full record

ArticleDisease models & mechanisms2014

Spotlight on zebrafish: translational impact.

E Elizabeth Patton, Paraminder Dhillon, James F Amatruda, Lalita Ramakrishnan

Open access · goldAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Disease models & mechanisms, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Exercise quantity-dependent muscle hypertrophy in adult zebrafish (Danio rerio).Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2016
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

E Elizabeth PattonMRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK. e.patton@igmm.ed.ac.uk.
Paraminder DhillonDisease Models & Mechanisms, The Company of Biologists, Bidder Building, 140 Cowley Road, Cambridgeshire, UK.
James F AmatrudaUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Lalita RamakrishnanUniversity of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Southwestern Medical CenterUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Host-Responses to Mycobacterium Infection in ZebrafishR37AI054503 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAMAKRISHNAN, LALITA · 2012 to 2021
$3.1M
Medical Research Council MC_PC_U127585840Medical Research Council MC_U127585840NIAID NIH HHS R37 AI054503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the zebrafish has emerged as an increasingly prominent model in biomedical research. To showcase the translational impact of the model across multiple disease areas, Disease Models & Mechanisms has compiled a Special Issue that includes thought-provoking reviews, original research reporting new and important insights into disease mechanisms, and novel resources that expand the zebrafish toolkit. This Editorial provides a summary of the issue's contents, highlighting the diversity of zebrafish disease models and their clinical applications.

Indexed as

Translational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryTransplantation, HeterologousZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24973741
PMCPMC4073261
OpenAlexW2134515491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.