Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24972749›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2014

[Gender-specific differences in capillaroscopy in healthy persons and patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases].

J G Richter, P Klein-Weigel, R Brinks, M Schneider, O Sander

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J G RichterPoliklinik für Rheumatologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland, Jutta.richter@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
P Klein-Weigel
R Brinks
M Schneider
O Sander
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCapillaroscopy is an established tool to assess morphological and functional findings of the microcirculation which have a confirmed association with disease activity and damage of inflammatory rheumatic diseases, especially systemic sclerosis. Hairpin-shaped capillaries with normal density predict a very low risk for collagenosis.

methodsOwn databases were evaluated with respect to the topic of the manuscript and the current literature was evaluated.

resultsThe healthy population does not only demonstrate hairpin shape as capillaroscopic normal findings and morphological and functional abnormalities can also be found which show various patterns depending on gender and age. These can be found in healthy persons and also patients with collagenosis. Ectasia and sludge phenomenon are more common in women and tortuous capillaries are more common in men. Capillary filling is often decreased in women and increased in male patients.

conclusionWhen assessing capillaroscopy findings, gender and the morphological or functional alterations which can be found in the normal healthy population should be taken into consideration. In further studies with capillaroscopy as the target parameter, the potential source of the disturbance should be known, especially in small populations, and if necessary balanced by weighted randomization.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInflammationMaleMicroscopic AngioscopyMicrovesselsMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesRheumatic DiseasesSensitivity and SpecificitySex

Identifiers

PMID24972749
OpenAlexW960831845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.